ArticleDer Unfallchirurg2012
[Kidney injury and multiple trauma: outcome, course and treatment algorithm. An organ-specific evaluation of 835 patients from the trauma register of the DGU].
Article in Der Unfallchirurg, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trends of incidence, management and outcome of renal trauma in Germany (2008-2022): an analysis based on the TraumaRegister DGU®.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Influence of a soft tissue layer covering the kidney upon blunt impact.International journal of legal medicine · 2020Article
- [Importance of air ambulances for the care of the severely injured].Der Unfallchirurg · 2015Article
- [Abdominal polytrauma and parenchymal organs].Der Radiologe · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe relevance of renal trauma in severely injured patients within a large collective has not yet been thoroughly reviewed. This study aimed at assessing the prevalence of renal trauma in relation to the outcome and the currently established method of treatment. PATIENTS AND
methodsAltogether data of 35,664 patients of the TraumaRegister of the German Society of Trauma Surgery (DGU) (1996-2007) were interpreted retrospectively. All patients with an injury severity score (ISS) ≥16, direct admission to a trauma center and an age of ≥16 years were included. All patients with abdominal trauma (AIS(Abdomen) ≥2) were compared with patients with abdominal and renal trauma (AIS(Kidney) ≥2).
resultsA total of 18,416 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria of which 6,218 (34.1%) had abdominal injuries. Of these patients with abdominal injury 835 (13.3%) additionally showed a kidney injury (AIS(Abdomen) ≥2, AIS(Kidney) 2-5) and were analyzed according to the classification of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) organ-severity-score. AAST kidney: II°: 45.5%, III°: 31.1%, IV°: 15.6%, V°: 7.8%. Patients with leading kidney injury (grade IV and V) thereby showed a significant increase in mortality (IV: 32.3% and V: 40.0%) and an increase in the need for surgical intervention (IV: 61.5 and V: 81.5%). With an increasing grade of renal injury, however, the ISS is also increased but mortality was not increased over the expected mortality rate (RISC score) due to the additional renal injury. Dialysis rate in the surviving patients showed an increased rate depending on the degree of the kidney injury (II: 5.5%, III: 7.6%, IV: 18.8%, V: 8.3%).
conclusionThe results presented here show the prevalence and the outcome of kidney injury in a large collective within the TraumaRegister of the DGU for the first time. Based on the current literature and the findings a treatment algorithm has been developed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21161149What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.