ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2010
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography associated pancreatitis: A 15-year review.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of Acute Pancreatitis in the Pediatric Population: A Clinical Report From the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Pancreas Committee.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2018Guideline
- Diclofenac sodium versus ceftazidime for preventing pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2017Trial
- Somatostatin and Its Analogues as Second-Line Treatments in Non-Neoplastic Conditions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Readmission rate and complications following biopsy of the ampulla of Vater-A retrospective data analysis.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023Article
- Naproxen, isosorbide dinitrate and co-administration cannot prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: Randomized controlled trial.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2020Article
- Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with ampullary biopsy vs ERCP alone: a matched-pairs controlled evaluation of outcomes and complications.Gastroenterology report · 2017Article
- Comparison between loop-tip guidewire-assisted and conventional endoscopic cannulation in high risk patients.Endoscopy international open · 2015Article
- Complications following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: minimal invasive surgical recommendations.PloS one · 2014Article
- Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: how to avoid and manage them.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2013Article
- Prophecy about post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: from divination to science.World journal of gastroenterology · 2013Article
- Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography pancreatitis: is time for a new preventive approach?World journal of gastroenterology · 2012Article
- Endoscopic complications--avoidance and management.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this article is to review the literature regarding post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis. We searched for and evaluated all articles describing the diagnosis, epidemiology, pathophysiology, morbidity, mortality and prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) in adult patients using the PubMed database. Search terms included endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, pancreatitis, ampulla of vater, endoscopic sphincterotomy, balloon dilatation, cholangiography, adverse events, standards and utilization. We limited our review of articles to those published between January 1, 1994 and August 15, 2009 regarding human adults and written in the English language. Publications from the reference sections were reviewed and included if they were salient and fell into the time period of interest. Between the dates queried, seventeen large (> 500 patients) prospective and four large retrospective trials were conducted. PEP occurred in 1%-15% in the prospective trials and in 1%-4% in the retrospective trials. PEP was also reduced with pancreatic duct stent placement and outcomes were improved with endoscopic sphincterotomy compared to balloon sphincter dilation in the setting of choledocholithiasis. Approximately 34 pharmacologic agents have been evaluated for the prevention of PEP over the last fifteen years in 63 trials. Although 22 of 63 trials published during our period of review suggested a reduction in PEP, no pharmacologic therapy has been widely accepted in clinical use in decreasing the development of PEP. In conclusion, PEP is a well-recognized complication of ERCP. Medical treatment for prevention has been disappointing. Proper patient selection and pancreatic duct stenting have been shown to reduce the complication rate in randomized clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.