Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21160603›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of cardiology2010

Neoplastic pericardial disease: Old and current strategies for diagnosis and management.

Chiara Lestuzzi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of cardiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. ANMCO POSITION PAPER: cardio-oncology in the COVID era (CO and CO).European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Cardiac Tumors.Journal of cardiovascular echography · 2020
    Review
  8. Cardiogenic shock in cancer.Heart failure reviews · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Early and long-term outcomes of pericardiotomy in the treatment of primary cardiac tamponade.Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Pericardial lymphoma in seven cats.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2014
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Heart failure in sub-Saharan Africa.Current cardiology reviews · 2013
    Review
  18. Pericarditis and pericardial effusion: management update.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2011
    Article
  19. Diagnosis and management of pericardial effusion.World journal of cardiology · 2011
    Article
  20. Management of Malignant Pericardial Effusion.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Chiara LestuzziChiara Lestuzzi, Department of Cardiology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, IRCCS, National Cancer Institute, Via F. Gallini 2, 33081 Aviano (PN), Italy.
National Cancer Institute · UA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of neoplastic pericardial diseases has changed over time and varies according to diagnostic methods. The diagnostic factor is usually the detection of neoplastic cells within the pericardial fluid or in specimens of pericardium, but the diagnosis may be difficult. Accurate sampling and cytopreparatory techniques, together with ancillary studies, including immunohistochemical tests and neoplastic marker dosage, are essential to obtain a reliable diagnosis. The goals of treatment may be simply to relieve symptoms (cardiac tamponade or dyspnea), to prevent recurrent effusion for a long-term symptomatic benefit, or to treat the local neoplastic disease with the aim of prolonging survival. Immediate relief of symptoms may be obtained with percutaneous drainage or with a surgical approach. For long term prevention of recurrences, various approaches have been proposed: extended drainage, pericardial window (surgical or percutaneous balloon pericardiostomy), sclerosing local therapy, local and/or systemic chemotherapy or radiation therapy (RT) (external or with intrapericardial radionuclides). The outcomes of various therapeutic approaches vary for different tumor types. Lymphoma and leukemias can be successfully treated with systemic chemotherapy; for solid tumors, percutaneous drainage and the use of systemic and/or local sclerosing and antineoplastic therapy seems to offer the best chance of success. The use of "pure" sclerosing agents has been replaced by agents with both sclerosing and antineoplastic activity (bleomycin or thiotepa), which seems to be quite effective in breast cancer, at least when associated with systemic chemotherapy. Local chemotherapy with platinum, mitoxantrone and other agents may lead to good local control of the disease, but the addition of systemic chemotherapy is probably relevant in order to prolong survival. The surgical approach (creation of a pericardial window, even with the mini-invasive method of balloon pericardiostomy) and RT may be useful in recurring effusions or in cases that are refractory to other therapeutic approaches.

Indexed as

DiagnosisNeoplastic pericardial diseaseNeoplastic pericarditisTherapy

Identifiers

PMID21160603
PMCPMC2999066
OpenAlexW2006571105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.