Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21160072›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology of the cell2010

Toward quantitative "in vivo biochemistry" with fluorescence fluctuation spectroscopy.

Brian D Slaughter, Rong Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology of the cell, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Imaging methodologies for systems biology.Cell adhesion & migration · 2014
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brian D SlaughterStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA. brs@stowers.org
Rong Li

Funding

Mechanisms of cell polarization in yeastR01GM057063 · NIGMS · STOWERS INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI LI, RONG · 1998 to 2015
$5.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM057063NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM057063
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative description of protein dynamics and interactions in vivo with temporal and spatial resolution is a key step in dissecting molecular mechanisms in cell biology. Fluorescence fluctuation spectroscopy (FFS) has recently emerged as a powerful in vivo tool for assessing molecular concentration and movement and formation of hetero- and homo-oligomeric complexes. This article discusses point FFS-based analysis methods that have proven useful to cell biologists, focusing on the kinds of information they provide, their pros and cons, and the basic instrumentation required. Along the way, we describe briefly a few recent examples where these analyses have helped address important biological questions.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsCells, CulturedDiffusionDrosophilaFungal ProteinsHumansProtein Interaction MappingProtein MultimerizationProtein Structure, QuaternaryProtein Structure, TertiaryRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSpectrometry, FluorescenceTime FactorsYeastsZebrafishFungal ProteinsRecombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21160072
PMCPMC3002384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.