Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21159963›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2010

Projection-specific neuromodulation of medial prefrontal cortex neurons.

Nikolai C Dembrow, Raymond A Chitwood, Daniel Johnston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 211 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
211citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

211 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Selective mGluBiological psychiatry global open science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Intrinsic Dendritic Integration Features of Prefrontal Layer 5 Pyramidal Cell Subclasses.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

151 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nikolai C DembrowCenter for Learning and Memory, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA. nikolai@mail.clm.utexas.edu
Raymond A Chitwood
Daniel Johnston

Funding

Regulation of Neuronal Excitability (P01)P01NS037444 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI JOHNSTON, DANIEL · 1999 to 2008
$8.4M
CELLULAR INFORMATION PROCESSING IN THE HIPPOCAMPUSR01MH048432 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI JOHNSTON, DANIEL · 1991 to 2012
$3.8M
PHARMACOLOGY OF MOSSY FIBER SYNAPTIC PLASTICITYR37MH044754 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI JOHNSTON, DANIEL · 1989 to 2008
$3.2M
Neuronal Mechanisms for Working Memory in Prefrontal CortexR01MH094839 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI JOHNSTON, DANIEL, MAUK, MICHAEL D · 2011 to 2015
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS MH048432NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH048432NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH094839NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH044754NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS037444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mnemonic persistent activity in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) constitutes the neural basis of working memory. To understand how neuromodulators contribute to the generation of persistent activity, it is necessary to identify the intrinsic properties of the layer V pyramidal neurons that transfer this information to downstream networks. Here we show that the somatic dynamic and integrative properties of layer V pyramidal neurons in the rat medial PFC depend on whether they project subcortically to the pons [corticopontine (CPn)] or to the contralateral cortex [commissural (COM)]. CPn neurons display low temporal summation and accelerate in firing frequency when depolarized, whereas COM neurons have high temporal summation and display spike frequency accommodation. In response to dynamic stimuli, COM neurons act as low-pass filters, whereas CPn neurons act as bandpass filters, resonating in the theta frequency range (3-6 Hz). The disparate subthreshold properties of COM and CPn neurons can be accounted for by differences in the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide gated cation h-current. Interestingly, neuromodulators hypothesized to enhance mnemonic persistent activity affect COM and CPn neurons distinctly. Adrenergic modulation shifts the dynamic properties of CPn but not COM neurons and increases the excitability of CPn neurons significantly more than COM neurons. In response to cholinergic modulation, CPn neurons were much more likely to display activity-dependent intrinsic persistent firing than COM neurons. Together, these data suggest that the two categories of projection neurons may subserve separate functions in PFC and may be engaged differently during working memory processes.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsCarbacholClonidineMaleMembrane PotentialsNeural PathwaysNeuroanatomical Tract-Tracing TechniquesNeurotransmitter AgentsPrefrontal CortexPyramidal CellsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyCarbacholClonidineNeurotransmitter Agents

Identifiers

PMID21159963
PMCPMC3075873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.