Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21159574›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2010

Delivery room management of very low birth weight infants in Germany, Austria and Switzerland--a comparison of protocols.

C C Roehr, S Gröbe, M Rüdiger, H Hummler, M Nelle, H Proquitté, H Hammer, G Schmalisch

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of medical research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Assessment of endotracheal tube placement in newborn infants: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2016
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Brain oxygenation monitoring during neonatal resuscitation of very low birth weight infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

C C RoehrDepartment of Neonatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Chariteplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany. christoph.roehr@charite.de
S Gröbe
M Rüdiger
H Hummler
M Nelle
H Proquitté
H Hammer
G Schmalisch

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurveys from the USA, Australia and Spain have shown significant inter-institutional variation in delivery room (DR) management of very low birth weight infants (VLBWI, <1500g) at birth, despite regularly updated international guidelines.

objectiveTo investigate protocols for DR management of VLBWI in Germany, Austria and Switzerland and to compare these with the 2005 ILCOR guidelines.

methodsDR management protocols were surveyed in a prospective, questionnaire-based survey in 2008. Results were compared between countries and between academic and non-academic units. Protocols were compared to the 2005 ILCOR guidelines.

resultsIn total, 190/249 units (76%) replied. Protocols for DR management existed in 94% of units. Statistically significant differences between countries were found regarding provision of 24 hr in house neonatal service; presence of a designated resuscitation area; devices for respiratory support; use of pressure-controlled manual ventilation devices; volume control by respirator; and dosage of Surfactant. There were no statistically significant differences regarding application and monitoring of supplementary oxygen, or targeted saturation levels, or for the use of sustained inflations. Comparison of academic and non-academic hospitals showed no significant differences, apart from the targeted saturation levels (SpO2) at 10 min. of life. Comparison with ILCOR guidelines showed good adherence to the 2005 recommendations. SUMMARY: Delivery room management in German, Austrian and Swiss neonatal units was commonly based on written protocols. Only minor differences were found regarding the DR setup, devices used and the targeted ranges for SpO2 and FiO2. DR management was in good accordance with 2005 ILCOR guidelines, some units already incorporated evidence beyond the ILCOR statement into their routine practice.

Indexed as

Delivery RoomsInfant, Very Low Birth WeightPractice Guidelines as TopicAustriaContinuous Positive Airway PressureFemaleGermanyHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancySwitzerland

Identifiers

PMID21159574
PMCPMC3352658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.