Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21157582›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie2010

How well does the Internet answer patients' questions about inflammatory bowel disease?

Steven Promislow, John R Walker, Mohammed Taheri, Charles Noah Bernstein

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Persian language health websites on Ebola disease: less credible than you think?The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Internet Usage Trends in Thoracic Surgery Patients and Their Caregivers.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Health information seeking behaviors of ethnically diverse adolescents.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2014
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The information needs and preferences of persons with longstanding inflammatory bowel disease.Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie · 2012
    Article
  19. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steven PromislowIBD Clinical and Research Center, Department of Clinical Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba.
John R Walker
Mohammed Taheri
Charles Noah Bernstein
University of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundthe Internet is an increasingly important source of health information.

objectiveto assess how well common websites answered patients' questions regarding inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

methodsthirty websites were identified and evaluated. Based on a previous survey of patient information needs, a comprehensive question list was developed in the three following areas: medical information (seven items), medical treatment (six items) and selfmanagement (eight items). The websites were evaluated for the amount of information they provided to answer each question using two standard measures of information quality - the DISCERN and the Ensuring Quality Information for Patients scales.

resultsfour particularly strong websites, scoring highest (on a scale from 1 to 5) in terms of IBD information, were the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America (mean information score 4.3), About.com (4.2), HealthCentral (3.8) and WebMD (3.8). These websites also scored well on the DISCERN and the Ensuring Quality Information for Patients quality scales. Most websites provided at least adequate information on common symptoms, complications, treatments and what is known (or not known) about the causes of IBD. However, many websites did not provide adequate information about prognosis, possible side effects of treatment and risks of developing cancer. Information regarding self-management was covered to a very limited extent.

conclusionwebsites could be strengthened by providing more of the information patients deem to be important, and by more clearly identifying sources of information and the date the information was updated. Most websites would benefit from more attention given to reducing the reading level and improving the organization of material.

Indexed as

Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesInternetConsumer Health InformationHumansInformation DisseminationPatient Education as TopicSelf Care

Identifiers

PMID21157582
PMCPMC3004420
OpenAlexW190368562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.