ArticleClinical medicine insights. Circulatory, respiratory and pulmonary medicine2010
Variability in measures of exhaled breath na, influence of pulmonary blood flow and salivary na.
Article in Clinical medicine insights. Circulatory, respiratory and pulmonary medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Moderate intensity exercise mediates comparable increases in exhaled chloride as albuterol in individuals with cystic fibrosis.Respiratory medicine · 2015Trial
- Essentials in saline pharmacology for nasal or respiratory hygiene in times of COVID-19.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2021Review
- Exhaled breath condensate detects baseline reductions in chloride and increases in response to albuterol in cystic fibrosis patients.Clinical medicine insights. Circulatory, respiratory and pulmonary medicine · 2013Article
- Genetic variation of the alpha subunit of the epithelial Na+ channel influences exhaled Na+ in healthy humans.Respiratory physiology & neurobiology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The assessment of inflammatory markers and ions in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) is being utilized more frequently in diseases such as asthma and cystic fibrosis with marked variability in EBC measures, including those of exhaled Na(+). We sought to determine if variability in exhaled Na(+) was due to differences in pulmonary blood flow (PBF) or Na(+) in the mouth (salivary Na(+)). We measured exhaled Na(+) three times with coinciding sampling of salivary Na(+) and assessment of PBF (using acetylene rebreathing) in 13 healthy subjects (54% female, age = 27 ± 7 yrs., ht. = 172 ± 10 cm, wt. = 70 ± 21 kg, BMI = 22 ± 7 kg/m(2) mean ± SD). Exhaled Na(+) averaged 2.7 ± 1.2 mmol/l, and salivary Na(+) averaged 5.51 ± 4.58 mmol/l. The coefficients of variation across all three measures in all 13 subjects averaged 30% for exhaled Na(+) and 83% for salivary Na(+), within subjects the variability across the three measures averaged 30% for exhaled Na(+) and 38% for salivary Na(+). Across all three measures in all 13 subjects the relationship between PBF and exhaled Na(+) averaged 0.027 (P = 0.87), and the relationship between salivary Na(+) and exhaled Na(+) concentrations averaged 0.59 (P = 0.001). Also, we sought to determine the relationship between exhaled Na(+) and serum Na(+) in an addition 20 subjects. There was a moderate and significant relationship between serum Na(+) and exhaled Na(+) (r = 0.37, P = 0.04). These findings suggest there that the variability in exhaled Na(+) is caused, at least in part, by droplet formation from within the mouth as turbulent air passes through and that there is a flux of ions from the pulmonary blood into the airways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.