Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21156272›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry2011

Safety and efficacy of ABT-089 in pediatric attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: results from two randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials.

Timothy E Wilens, Laura M Gault, Ann Childress, Christopher J Kratochvil, Lindsey Bensman, Coleen M Hall, Evelyn Olson, Weining Z Robieson, Tushar S Garimella, Walid M Abi-Saab and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study of α4β2 agonist ABT-894 in adults with ADHD.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2013
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Therapeutic Applications of Nicotinic Stimulation: Successes, Failures, and Future Prospects.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2019
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Nicotinic α4β2 Cholinergic Receptor Influences on Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortical Neuronal Firing during a Working Memory Task.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Timothy E WilensMassachusetts General Hospital, Pediatric Psychopharmacology Unit, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA. twilens@partners.org
Laura M Gault
Ann Childress
Christopher J Kratochvil
Lindsey Bensman
Coleen M Hall
Evelyn Olson
Weining Z Robieson
Tushar S Garimella
Walid M Abi-Saab
George Apostol
Mario D Saltarelli
Abbott (United States) · USNovartis (Switzerland) · CHCenter for Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine · USMass General Brigham · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

Etiologies of Stimulant Misuse in College StudentsK24DA016264 · NIDA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WILENS, TIMOTHY E · 2004 to 2013
$1.7M
NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA016264
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the safety and efficacy of ABT-089, a novel α(4)β(2) neuronal nicotinic receptor partial agonist, vs. placebo in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

methodTwo multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies of children 6 through 12 years of age were conducted. Study 1 (n = 274) assessed six treatment groups over 8 weeks: 4 once-daily (QD) ABT-089 doses (0.085-0.700 mg/kg), QD atomoxetine, and placebo. Study 2 (n = 119) assessed three treatment groups over 6 weeks: 2 QD ABT-089 doses (0.7 mg/kg, 1.4 mg/kg) and placebo. The primary efficacy variable was the investigator-administered Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV: Home Version (ADHD-RS-IV [HV]) Total Score. Safety was assessed by adverse event (AE) monitoring, laboratory tests, vital signs, physical examinations, and electrocardiogram measures.

resultsThere was no statistically significant difference between ABT-089 and placebo in mean change from baseline to final evaluation of ADHD-RS-IV (HV) Total Score or other outcome measures at any dose in either study. In Study 1, atomoxetine showed statistically significant improvement for the primary and most secondary endpoints. ABT-089 was generally safe and well tolerated, with no statistically significant difference between any ABT-089 dose and placebo in the overall incidence of any specific AE, and no clinically significant changes in other safety measures.

conclusionsABT-089 did not show efficacy on the primary efficacy variable, the ADHD-RS-IV (HV) Total Score, or other measures of ADHD symptomatology in children with ADHD, and had a safety profile similar to placebo. These results contrast with published reports of efficacy of nicotinic modulators in adults with ADHD.

Indexed as

PyridinesPyrrolidinesAdrenergic Uptake InhibitorsAdultAtomoxetine HydrochlorideAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityChildDouble-Blind MethodDrug MonitoringFemaleHumansMaleNicotinic AgonistsPropylaminesPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesTreatment OutcomeAdrenergic Uptake InhibitorsAtomoxetine HydrochlorideNicotinic AgonistspozaniclinePropylaminesPyridinesPyrrolidines

Identifiers

PMID21156272
PMCPMC3757954
OpenAlexW2048740041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.