Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21156127›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2010

How sequence determines elasticity of disordered proteins.

Shanmei Cheng, Murat Cetinkaya, Frauke Gräter

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Hepatitis C Virus Structure: Defined by What It Is Not.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The impact ofChemical science · 2018
    Article
  15. The Eukaryotic COCell · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Shanmei ChengGerman Max Planck Society-Chinese Academy of Sciences Partner Institute and Key Laboratory for Computational Biology, Shanghai Institute for Biological Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Murat Cetinkaya
Frauke Gräter
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How nature tunes sequences of disordered protein to yield the desired coiling properties is not yet well understood. To shed light on the relationship between protein sequence and elasticity, we here investigate four different natural disordered proteins with elastomeric function, namely: FG repeats in the nucleoporins; resilin in the wing tendon of dragonfly; PPAK in the muscle protein titin; and spider silk. We obtain force-extension curves for these proteins from extensive explicit solvent molecular dynamics simulations, which we compare to purely entropic coiling by modeling the four proteins as entropic chains. Although proline and glycine content are in general indicators for the entropic elasticity as expected, divergence from simple additivity is observed. Namely, coiling propensities correlate with polyproline II content more strongly than with proline content, and given a preponderance of glycines for sufficient backbone flexibility, nonlocal interactions such as electrostatic forces can result in strongly enhanced coiling, which results for the case of resilin in a distinct hump in the force-extension curve. Our results, which are directly testable by force spectroscopy experiments, shed light on how evolution has designed unfolded elastomeric proteins for different functions.

Indexed as

ElasticityAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaEntropyMolecular Dynamics SimulationProteinsSolventsStatic ElectricityStructure-Activity RelationshipProteinsSolvents

Identifiers

PMID21156127
PMCPMC3000487
OpenAlexW2041459273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.