SynthesisBMC medicine2010
Systematic review of the evidence relating FEV1 decline to giving up smoking.
Synthesis in BMC medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of the health-related outcomes for traditional cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heat-not-burn cigarettes and snus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2026Pooled it
- The relation of circulating YKL-40 to levels and decline of lung function in adult life.Respiratory medicine · 2013Pooled it
- Secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in older adults: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2013Guideline
- Systematic review with meta-analysis of the epidemiological evidence relating smoking to COPD, chronic bronchitis and emphysema.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2011Pooled it
- Trial
- A randomized controlled trial of vitamin E and selenium on rate of decline in lung function.Respiratory research · 2015Trial
- Effects of mediterranean diet on lung function in smokers: a randomised, parallel and controlled protocol.BMC public health · 2015Trial
- Pipe and cigar use, lung function decline and clinical outcomes: an analysis of the NHLBI Pooled Cohorts Study.Thorax · 2026Article
- Quantitative CT Patterns and Functional Loss Related to Welding Fume Exposure, While Handling the Confounding Effect of Cigarette Smoking.Canadian respiratory journal · 2026Article
- Short-term association between ambient air pollution and heart rate variability: results from the population-based KORA S4 and FF4 studies.Particle and fibre toxicology · 2025Article
- Comparative effects of cigarette smoking, e-cigarette use, and dual use on pulmonary function, exercise capacity, and quality of life in young adults: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Risk of All-Cause Mortality in Mild Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Evidence From the NHANES III and 2007-2012.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025Article
- Clinical Characteristics of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease according to Smoking Status.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2025Article
- Heterogeneities and impact profiles of early chronic obstructive pulmonary disease status: findings from the China Pulmonary Health Study.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2024Article
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease burden, grades and erythrocytosis at a tertiary hospital in western Uganda.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Article
- Association of systemic anticholinergic medication use and accelerated decrease in lung function in older adults.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The Role of Smoking in the Mechanisms of Development of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Atherosclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Association Between Smoking Cessation Treatment and Healthcare Costs in a Single-Payer Public Healthcare System.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023Article
- PROMETHEUS: Long-Term Exacerbation and Mortality Benefits of Implementing Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy in the US COPD Population.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2023Article
- Host-microbiome interactions: Gut-Liver axis and its connection with other organs.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe rate of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) decline ("beta") is a marker of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease risk. The reduction in beta after quitting smoking is an upper limit for the reduction achievable from switching to novel nicotine delivery products. We review available evidence to estimate this reduction and quantify the relationship of smoking to beta.
methodsStudies were identified, in healthy individuals or patients with respiratory disease, that provided data on beta over at least 2 years of follow-up, separately for those who gave up smoking and other smoking groups. Publications to June 2010 were considered. Independent beta estimates were derived for four main smoking groups: never smokers, ex-smokers (before baseline), quitters (during follow-up) and continuing smokers. Unweighted and inverse variance-weighted regression analyses compared betas in the smoking groups, and in continuing smokers by amount smoked, and estimated whether beta or beta differences between smoking groups varied by age, sex and other factors.
resultsForty-seven studies had relevant data, 28 for both sexes and 19 for males. Sixteen studies started before 1970. Mean follow-up was 11 years. On the basis of weighted analysis of 303 betas for the four smoking groups, never smokers had a beta 10.8 mL/yr (95% confidence interval (CI), 8.9 to 12.8) less than continuing smokers. Betas for ex-smokers were 12.4 mL/yr (95% CI, 10.1 to 14.7) less than for continuing smokers, and for quitters, 8.5 mL/yr (95% CI, 5.6 to 11.4) less. These betas were similar to that for never smokers. In continuing smokers, beta increased 0.33 mL/yr per cigarette/day. Beta differences between continuing smokers and those who gave up were greater in patients with respiratory disease or with reduced baseline lung function, but were not clearly related to age or sex.
conclusionThe available data have numerous limitations, but clearly show that continuing smokers have a beta that is dose-related and over 10 mL/yr greater than in never smokers, ex-smokers or quitters. The greater decline in those with respiratory disease or reduced lung function is consistent with some smokers having a more rapid rate of FEV1 decline. These results help in designing studies comparing continuing smokers of conventional cigarettes and switchers to novel products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.