Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21156016›Full record

ArticleBJU international2011

Evaluation of nuclear factor κB and chemokine receptor CXCR4 co-expression in patients with prostate cancer in the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 8610.

Meena Okera, Kyoungwha Bae, Eric Bernstein, Liang Cheng, Colleen Lawton, Harvey Wolkov, Alan Pollack, Adam Dicker, Howard Sandler, Christopher J Sweeney

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJU international, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Low Tristetraprolin Expression Is Associated with Lethal Prostate Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Meena OkeraDepartment of Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
Kyoungwha Bae
Eric Bernstein
Liang Cheng
Colleen Lawton
Harvey Wolkov
Alan Pollack
Adam Dicker
Howard Sandler
Christopher J Sweeney
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USProvidence Portland Medical Center · USRoyal Adelaide Hospital · AURTOG Foundation · USThomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Margaret von Mehren · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
Radiation, Hormones &Antisense Prostate Cancer TherapyR01CA101984 · NCI · FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER · PI POLLACK, ALAN · 2003 to 2007
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS CA-006927NCI NIH HHS CA-101984-01NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927NCI NIH HHS R01 CA101984
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the frequency of nuclear factor κB (NFκB) and the chemokine receptor CXCR4 co-expression in prostate cancer specimens from men with locally advanced disease. PATIENTS AND

methodsParaffin-embedded samples from patients enrolled on the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 8610 trial underwent immunohistochemical staining for NFκB and CXCR4. The amount of NFκB and CXCR4 was scored by a 'blinded' pathologist for the percentage of cells stained (0-100%) and staining intensity (0-3 +). Cox proportional hazard models were used for overall survival and disease-free survival to examine if NFκB and/or CXCR4 expression were associated with patient outcomes with and without adjustment for covariates.

resultsAvailable material and successful staining allowed NFκB and CXCR4 status to be determined for 55 and 63 patients, respectively. Both NFκB and CXCR4 status were available for 51 patients. Of these, 53% were 2/3 + for cytoplasmic NFκB staining and 56% were 2/3 + for CXCR4. In all, 18 of the 51 patients were 2/3 + for both NFκB and CXCR4 (P = 0.129). Ten of 11 patients with 3 + NFκB had 2/3 + CXCR4 (P= 0.004). In this small study, neither NFκB nor CXCR4 were associated with prostate cancer outcomes.

conclusionsHigh NFκB expression is associated with CXCR4 expression and they are co-expressed in about one third of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Larger studies to accurately determine the frequency of co-expression and prognostic utility of NFκB and CXCR4 alone and in combination are warranted.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNF-kappa BProstatic NeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReceptors, CXCR4Retrospective StudiesNF-kappa BReceptors, CXCR4

Identifiers

PMID21156016
PMCPMC3062644
OpenAlexW2144891415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.