Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21155039›Full record

ArticleYonsei medical journal2011

The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of gastric cancer recurrence after curative gastrectomy.

Ji Eun Lee, Sung Pyo Hong, Dae Ho Ahn, Tae Joo Jeon, Min Kyung Kang, Chang Il Kwon, Kwang Hyun Ko, Seong Gyu Hwang, Pil Won Park, Kyu Sung Rim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. The Prognostic Significance of Preoperative StagingMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the Evaluation of Gastric Cancer Recurrence.Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2014
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ji Eun LeeDigestive Disease Center, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea.
Sung Pyo Hong
Dae Ho Ahn
Tae Joo Jeon
Min Kyung Kang
Chang Il Kwon
Kwang Hyun Ko
Seong Gyu Hwang
Pil Won Park
Kyu Sung Rim
CHA University · KRCHA University Bundang Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose(18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) scans are frequently performed for the screening or staging of malignant tumors. This study aimed to assess the usefulness of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in detection of gastric cancer recurrence after curative gastrectomy. MATERIALS AND

methodsEighty nine patients who had undergone curative gastrectomy due to gastric cancer and had (18)F-FDG PET/CT and contrast CT scans within 2 weeks for surveillance in asymptomatic patients (n = 11) or to clarify suspected recurrence (n = 78) were consecutively collected and retrospectively analyzed. They had clinical follow-up for at least 12 months after PET/CT and CT scans.

resultsFifteen of the 89 patients (16.9%) were diagnosed with recurrent gastric cancer in 21 organs. Forty one organs showed an increase in FDG uptake, and only 9 of these organs were diagnosed with recurrent gastric cancer by (18)F-FDG PET/CT. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of the (18)F-FDG PET/CT were 42.9%, 59.7%, 29.3%, 78.2%, and 57.3%, respectively. On the CT scan, 18 of 21 recurrent gastric cancers were detected, and 7 cases were in agreement with the (18)F-FDG PET/CT. The sensitivity and specificity of the CT scan were 85.8% and 87.3%, respectively, which are superior to the (18)F-FDG PET/CT. When we diagnosed a recurrence based on either (18)F-FDG PET/CT or CT scans, the sensitivity increased to 95.2% and the specificity decreased to 45.6%, when compared with the contrast CT scan alone.

conclusion(18)F-FDG PET/CT is an insufficient diagnostic method in detection of recurrence after curative gastrectomy, and even less accurate than contrast CT scan alone.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18GastrectomyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPositron-Emission TomographyStomach NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedFluorodeoxyglucose F18

Identifiers

PMID21155039
PMCPMC3017712
OpenAlexW2091882615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.