Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21154353›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010

Pharmacological and nutritional treatment for McArdle disease (Glycogen Storage Disease type V).

Rosaline Quinlivan, Andrea Martinuzzi, Benedikt Schoser

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Physical training for McArdle disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Metabolic myopathies.Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.) · 2013
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Rosaline QuinlivanMRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases and Dubowitz Neuromuscular Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery and Great Ormond Street, PO Box 114, London, UK, WC1B 3BN.
Andrea Martinuzzi
Benedikt Schoser
Friedrich Baur Stiftung · DEIRCCS Eugenio Medea · ITNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMcArdle disease (Glycogen Storage Disease type V) is caused by an absence of muscle phosphorylase leading to exercise intolerance, myoglobinuria rhabdomyolysis and acute renal failure.

objectivesTo review systematically the evidence from randomized controlled trials of pharmacological or nutritional treatments for improving exercise performance and quality of life in McArdle disease. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialised Register (17 May 2010), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 2, 2010 in The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (January 1966 to May 2010) and EMBASE (January 1980 to May 2010) using the search terms 'McArdle disease', 'Glycogen Storage Disease type V' and 'muscle phosphorylase deficiency'. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (including cross-over studies) and quasi-randomised trials. Unblinded open trials and individual patient studies were included in the discussion. Interventions included any pharmacological agent or nutritional supplement. Primary outcome measures included any objective assessment of exercise endurance (for example aerobic capacity (VO(2)) max, walking speed, muscle force or power and fatigability). Secondary outcome measures included metabolic changes (such as reduced plasma creatine kinase and a reduction in the frequency of myoglobinuria), subjective measures (including quality of life scores and indices of disability) and serious adverse events. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three review authors checked the titles and abstracts identified by the search and reviewed the manuscripts. In the first review two authors (RQ and RB) independently assessed methodological quality of relevant studies and extracted data onto a specially designed form. In this update methodological quality of data was assessed by RQ and AM with comments from BS. MAIN

resultsWe identified 31 studies,13 fulfilled the criteria for inclusion. Excluded trials are included in the Discussion. The largest treatment trial included 19 subjects. There was no benefit with: D-ribose, glucagon, verapamil, vitamin B(6), branched chain amino acids, dantrolene sodium, and high dose creatine. Minimal benefit was found with low dose creatine and ramipril only for patients with a polymorphism known as the D/D angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) phenotype. A carbohydrate-rich diet resulted in better exercise performance compared with a protein-rich diet. Two studies of oral sucrose given at different times and in different amounts before exercise showed an improvement in exercise performance. AUTHORS'

conclusionsAlthough there was low quality evidence of improvement in some parameters with creatine, oral sucrose, ramipril and a carbohydrate rich diet, none was sufficiently strong to indicate significant clinical benefit.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsCreatineDietary CarbohydratesDietary ProteinsGlycogen Storage Disease Type VHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCreatineDietary CarbohydratesDietary Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21154353
OpenAlexW4245088961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.