Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21154344›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010

Prophylactic methylxanthine for prevention of apnoea in preterm infants.

David J Henderson-Smart, Antonio G De Paoli

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Methylxanthine for the prevention and treatment of apnea in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Doxapram for the prevention and treatment of apnea in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for apnoea of prematurity.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David J Henderson-SmartNSW Centre for Perinatal Health Services Research, Queen Elizabeth II Research Institute, Building DO2, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2006.
Antonio G De Paoli
Royal Hobart Hospital · AUUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecurrent apnoea is common in preterm infants. These episodes can lead to hypoxaemia and bradycardia, which may be severe enough to require the use of positive pressure ventilation. In infants with apnoea, methylxanthine treatment has been used successfully to prevent further episodes. It is possible that prophylactic therapy given to all very preterm infants soon after birth might prevent apnoea and the need for additional ventilator support.

objectivesTo determine the effect of prophylactic treatment with methylxanthine on apnoea, bradycardia, episodes of hypoxaemia, use of mechanical ventilation, and morbidity in preterm infants at risk for apnoea of prematurity SEARCH STRATEGY: The standard search strategy of the Neonatal Review Group was updated in August 2010. This included searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE. SELECTION CRITERIA: All trials using random or quasi-random patient allocation in which prophylactic methylxanthine (caffeine or theophylline) was compared with placebo or no treatment in preterm infants were eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The standard methods of the Cochrane Collaboration and its Neonatal Review Group were used. MAIN

resultsThree studies were eligible for inclusion in the review. Two small studies (randomising a total of 104 infants) evaluated the effect of prophylactic caffeine on short term outcomes. There were no meaningful differences between the caffeine and placebo groups in the number of infants with apnoea, bradycardia, hypoxaemic episodes, use of IPPV or side effects in either of the studies. Only two outcomes (use of IPPV and tachycardia) were common to the two studies and meta-analysis showed no substantive differences between the groups. One large trial of caffeine therapy (CAP 2006) in a heterogeneous group of infants at risk for and having apnoea of prematurity demonstrated an improved rate of survival without developmental disability at 18 to 21 months corrected age. The reports of the subgroup of infants treated with prophylactic caffeine did not demonstrate any significant differences in clinical outcomes except for a decrease in the risk of PDA ligation. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThe results of this review do not support the use of prophylactic caffeine for preterm infants at risk of apnoea.Any future studies need to examine the effects of prophylactic methylxanthines in preterm infants at higher risk of apnoea. This should include examination of important clinical outcomes such as need for IPPV, neonatal morbidity, length of hospital stay and long term development.

Indexed as

ApneaBradycardiaCaffeineCentral Nervous System StimulantsHumansHypoxiaInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Premature, DiseasesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecurrenceTheophyllineXanthinesCaffeineCentral Nervous System StimulantsTheophyllineXanthines

Identifiers

PMID21154344
PMCPMC7032541
OpenAlexW2112563402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.