Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21153679›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2011

Retrospective study of dasatinib for recurrent glioblastoma after bevacizumab failure.

C Lu-Emerson, A D Norden, J Drappatz, E C Quant, R Beroukhim, A S Ciampa, L M Doherty, D C Lafrankie, S Ruland, P Y Wen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Circulating Immune Cell and Outcome Analysis from the Phase II Study of PD-L1 Blockade with Durvalumab for Newly Diagnosed and Recurrent Glioblastoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Clinical outcomes in recurrent glioblastoma with bevacizumab therapy: An analysis of the literature.Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2017
    Review
  17. Inhibition of radiation-induced glioblastoma invasion by genetic and pharmacological targeting of MDA-9/Syntenin.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Remodeling the Vascular Microenvironment of Glioblastoma with α-Particles.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2016
    Article
  20. Investigational new drugs for brain cancer.Expert opinion on investigational drugs · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

C Lu-EmersonCenter for Neuro-Oncology, Dana Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, 44 Binney Street, SW 430, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
A D Norden
J Drappatz
E C Quant
R Beroukhim
A S Ciampa
L M Doherty
D C Lafrankie
S Ruland
P Y Wen
Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCenter for Neuro-Oncology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is no effective treatment for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) after bevacizumab failure. Putative mechanisms of resistance to bevacizumab include increased pericyte coverage, mediated partly by platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) signaling, and an infiltrative tumor growth pattern potentially dependent on SRC. We explored the efficacy of dasatinib, a SRC, BCR-ABL, c-KIT, EPHA2, and PDGFRβ inhibitor, in patients with recurrent GBM after bevacizumab failure. Adult patients with histologically confirmed GBM who failed bevacizumab therapy were treated with dasatinib 70-100 mg twice daily in combination with bevacizumab (n = 14), until tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity. Fourteen patients were treated. Median age was 55 years (range 32-66) and median KPS was 80 (range 50-90). All patients (100%) had glioblastomas. The median number of prior regimens was 4 (range from 2 to 6). Of the thirteen evaluable patients, none had a complete or partial response. Only one patient had stable disease after an 8 week interval. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 28 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 26-35 days). Six month progression-free survival (PFS6) was 0%. Median overall survival (OS) was 78 days (95% CI 41-137 days). Treatment was moderately well-tolerated, although one patient sustained a grade 4 intracerebral hemorrhage. Dasatinib in conjunction with bevacizumab does not appear to have activity in patients with recurrent, heavily pretreated GBM.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabBrain NeoplasmsDasatinibFemaleGlioblastomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesRetrospective StudiesThiazolesAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabDasatinibProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesThiazoles

Identifiers

PMID21153679
OpenAlexW2001251040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.