Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21153561›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2011

Multilocus variable number tandem repeat analysis for Salmonella enterica subspecies.

S L Kruy, H van Cuyck, J L Koeck

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Snapshot of the Genetic Diversity ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. MLVA forFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S L KruyFood Microbiology Laboratory, Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, 5 Bd. Monivong, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. ksunlay@pasteur-kh.org
H van Cuyck
J L Koeck

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic analysis of Salmonella enterica revealed the existence of a variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) at multiple loci. Some S. enterica strains are considered as references (Typhi Ty2, Typhi CT18, Typhimurium LT2, Enteritidis LK5, PT4, and Enteritidis 07-2642, and Newport). These allowed the selection of markers to develop the genotyping technique, multiple-locus VNTR analysis (MLVA). These markers were used to discriminate S. enterica isolated from humans, food, or the environment. In this report, the characteristics and specifications of 58 salmonella markers described from 2003 to 2009 are analyzed. Some VNTR loci were used as markers. The markers were used to discriminate S. enterica isolates from different sources and geographical localizations. Among the VNTR loci described in the published reports, eight presented with a high diversity index (DI) of polymorphism of more than 0.80. The selection of several markers within a single locus validated their polymorphism characteristic. Despite unequal DI values, the use of a panel of markers is a powerful discriminatory tool for the surveillance and identification of the source of salmonella outbreak. Depending on the markers selected, MLVA should be used either for macro- or microepidemiological purposes. The main challenge in the future for this technique is standardization.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial Typing TechniquesEnvironmental MicrobiologyFood MicrobiologyGenotypeHumansMinisatellite RepeatsPolymorphism, GeneticSalmonella entericaSalmonella InfectionsSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.