Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21152245›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular epidemiology and genetics2010

Novel pathway analysis of genomic polymorphism-cancer risk interaction in the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial.

Barbara K Dunn, Mark H Greene, Jenny M Kelley, Joseph P Costantino, Robert J Clifford, Ying Hu, Gong Tang, Neely Kazerouni, Philip S Rosenberg, Daoud M Meerzaman and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular epidemiology and genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Barbara K Dunn
Mark H Greene
Jenny M Kelley
Joseph P Costantino
Robert J Clifford
Ying Hu
Gong Tang
Neely Kazerouni
Philip S Rosenberg
Daoud M Meerzaman
Kenneth H Buetow
National Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

PRIMARY CANCER THERAPY GROUP--NSABP (HEADQUARTERS)U10CA012027 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WOLMARK, NORMAN · 1985 to 2012
$117.2M
NSABP Foreign AccrualsU10CA037377 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WOLMARK, NORMAN · 1985 to 2014
$116.5M
STUDY TO ASSESS RALOXIFENE FOR PREVENTING BREAST CANCERU10CA069974 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI COSTANTINO, JOSEPH P. · 1995 to 2013
$62.4M
PRIMARY BREAST CANCER THERAPY--BIOSTATISTICS CENTERU10CA069651 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI COSTANTINO, JOSEPH P. · 1995 to 2012
$52.1M
Genetic Modifiers of Cancer RiskZIACP010142 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI MIRABELLO, LISA · 2009 to 2025
$17.1M
NSABP Biological Specimen BanksU24CA114732 · NCI · NSABP FOUNDATION, INC. · PI WOLMARK, NORMAN · 2005 to 2014
$9.4M
STRUCTURE AND STABILIZATION OF THE BACTERIAL NUCLEOIDZ01DK036120 · NIDDK · DIABETES, DIGESTIVE, KIDNEY DISEASES · PI ZIMMERMAN, STEVEN C. · 1998 to 2005
–
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999NCI NIH HHS U10 CA012027NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037377NCI NIH HHS U10 CA069651NCI NIH HHS U10 CA069974NCI NIH HHS U24 CA114732
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTamoxifen was approved for breast cancer risk reduction in high-risk women based on the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project's Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (P-1:BCPT), which showed 50% fewer breast cancers with tamoxifen versus placebo, supporting tamoxifen's efficacy in preventing breast cancer. Poor metabolizing CYP2D6 variants are currently the subject of intensive scrutiny regarding their impact on clinical outcomes in the adjuvant setting. Our study extends to variants in a wider spectrum of tamoxifen-metabolizing genes and applies to the prevention setting.

methodsOur case-only study, nested within P-1:BCPT, explored associations of polymorphisms in estrogen/tamoxifen-metabolizing genes with responsiveness to preventive tamoxifen. Thirty-nine candidate polymorphisms in 17 candidate genes were genotyped in 249 P-1:BCPT cases.

resultsCVP2D6_C1111T, individually and within a CYP2D6 haplotype, showed borderline significant association with treatment arm. Path analysis of the entire tamoxifen pathway gene network showed that the tamoxifen pathway model was consistent with the pattern of observed genotype variability within the placebo-arm dataset. However, correlation of variations in genes in the tamoxifen arm differed significantly from the predictions of the tamoxifen pathway model. Strong correlations between allelic variation in the tamoxifen pathway at CYP1A1-CYP3A4, CYP3A4-CYP2C9, and CYP2C9-SULT1A2, in addition to CYP2D6 and its adjacent genes, were seen in the placebo-arm but not the tamoxifen-arm. In conclusion, beyond reinforcing a role for CYP2D6 in tamoxifen response, our pathway analysis strongly suggests that specific combinations of allelic variants in other genes make major contributions to the tamoxifen-resistance phenotype.

Indexed as

Breast cancerbreast cancer riskchemopreventiongenomicpathway analysistamoxifen resistance

Identifiers

PMID21152245
PMCPMC2998292
OpenAlexW1538024131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.