Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21151630›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

Predicting outcomes of prostate cancer immunotherapy by personalized mathematical models.

Natalie Kronik, Yuri Kogan, Moran Elishmereni, Karin Halevi-Tobias, Stanimir Vuk-Pavlović, Zvia Agur

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. TNF-β +252 A>G polymorphism and susceptibility to cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2013
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. On the use of historical estimates.Statistical papers (Berlin, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Natalie KronikInstitute for Medical BioMathematics, Bene Ataroth, Israel.
Yuri Kogan
Moran Elishmereni
Karin Halevi-Tobias
Stanimir Vuk-Pavlović
Zvia Agur
Institute for Medical BioMathematics · ILMayo Clinic · US

Funding

Utility of serum and Tissue Biomarkers for Predicting Response to Androgen DeprivP50CA091956 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI TINDALL, DONALD J. · 2001 to 2010
$23.4M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA091956NCI NIH HHS P50CA91956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTherapeutic vaccination against disseminated prostate cancer (PCa) is partially effective in some PCa patients. We hypothesized that the efficacy of treatment will be enhanced by individualized vaccination regimens tailored by simple mathematical models. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe developed a general mathematical model encompassing the basic interactions of a vaccine, immune system and PCa cells, and validated it by the results of a clinical trial testing an allogeneic PCa whole-cell vaccine. For model validation in the absence of any other pertinent marker, we used the clinically measured changes in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels as a correlate of tumor burden. Up to 26 PSA levels measured per patient were divided into each patient's training set and his validation set. The training set, used for model personalization, contained the patient's initial sequence of PSA levels; the validation set contained his subsequent PSA data points. Personalized models were simulated to predict changes in tumor burden and PSA levels and predictions were compared to the validation set. The model accurately predicted PSA levels over the entire measured period in 12 of the 15 vaccination-responsive patients (the coefficient of determination between the predicted and observed PSA values was R(2) = 0.972). The model could not account for the inconsistent changes in PSA levels in 3 of the 15 responsive patients at the end of treatment. Each validated personalized model was simulated under many hypothetical immunotherapy protocols to suggest alternative vaccination regimens. Personalized regimens predicted to enhance the effects of therapy differed among the patients. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Using a few initial measurements, we constructed robust patient-specific models of PCa immunotherapy, which were retrospectively validated by clinical trial results. Our results emphasize the potential value and feasibility of individualized model-suggested immunotherapy protocols.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCalibrationCancer VaccinesHumansImmunotherapyMaleMedical OncologyModels, TheoreticalPrecision MedicinePrognosisProstateProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCancer VaccinesProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID21151630
PMCPMC2999571
OpenAlexW2145926562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.