Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21151581›Full record

ArticleJournal of Cancer2010

Cellular cancer vaccines: an update on the development of vaccines generated from cell surface antigens.

Petr G Lokhov, Elena E Balashova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Cancer, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. [Research Progress of Lung Cancer Vaccines].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Advanced Biomaterials for Cell-Specific Modulation and Restore of Cancer Immunotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Biomimetic Nanotechnology toward Personalized Vaccines.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2020
    Review
  14. SANTAVACVaccines · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Petr G Lokhov1. ZAO BioBohemia, Moscow, Russia.
Elena E Balashova

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recent advance in anti-cancer therapies has been the use of cancer cells to develop vaccines. However, immunization with cancer cell-based vaccines has not resulted in significant long-term therapeutic benefits. A possible reason for this is that while cancer cells provide surface antigens that are targets for a desired immune response, they also contain a high abundance of housekeeping proteins, carbohydrates, nucleic acids, lipids, and other intracellular contents that are ubiquitous in all mammalian cells. These ubiquitous molecules are not the intended targets of this therapy approach, and thus, the immune response generated is not sufficient to eliminate the cancer cells present. In this review, a discussion of the cell surface of cancer cells is presented in relation to the goals of improving antigen composition of cancer cell-based vaccines. Strategies to enrich vaccines for cancer-specific antigens are also discussed.

Indexed as

antiangiogenic cancer vaccinecell surface antigenscellular cancer vaccine

Identifiers

PMID21151581
PMCPMC3001283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.