ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2010
Biomarker analysis of stored blood products: emphasis on pre-analytical issues.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Continuous High-Throughput Plasma Separation for Blood Biomarker Sensing Using a Hydrodynamic Microfluidic Device.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
- Hitting the (bio)mark part 1: selecting and measuring biomarkers in cardiovascular research.European journal of cardiovascular nursing · 2024Review
- Whole transcriptome analysis of platelet concentrates during storage.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2023Article
- Improper preanalytical processes on peripheral blood compromise RNA quality and skew the transcriptional readouts of mRNA and LncRNA.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Computational Identification and Characterization of New microRNAs in Human Platelets Stored in a Blood Bank.Biomolecules · 2020Article
- MicroRNAs as a Potential Quality Measurement Tool of Platelet Concentrate Stored in Blood Banks-A Review.Cells · 2019Review
- Developments in label-free microfluidic methods for single-cell analysis and sorting.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2019Review
- High Prevalence of Antibodies against the Bacterium Treponema pallidum in Senegalese Guinea Baboons (Papio papio).PloS one · 2015Article
- The miRNA Profile of Platelets Stored in a Blood Bank and Its Relation to Cellular Damage from Storage.PloS one · 2015Article
- Pre-analytical stability of the plasma proteomes based on the storage temperature.Proteome science · 2013Article
- Lipidomic and metabolomic analysis of human erythrocytes during storage for transfusion applications.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangueArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Millions of blood products are transfused every year; many lives are thus directly concerned by transfusion. The three main labile blood products used in transfusion are erythrocyte concentrates, platelet concentrates and fresh frozen plasma. Each of these products has to be stored according to its particular components. However, during storage, modifications or degradation of those components may occur, and are known as storage lesions. Thus, biomarker discovery of in vivo blood aging as well as in vitro labile blood products storage lesions is of high interest for the transfusion medicine community. Pre-analytical issues are of major importance in analyzing the various blood products during storage conditions as well as according to various protocols that are currently used in blood banks for their preparations. This paper will review key elements that have to be taken into account in the context of proteomic-based biomarker discovery applied to blood banking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.