ArticlePLoS biology2010
Neighbourhood continuity is not required for correct testis gene expression in Drosophila.
Article in PLoS biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epigenetic state and gene expression remain stable after CRISPR/Cas-mediated chromosomal inversions.The New phytologist · 2025Article
- Evidence of Nonrandom Patterns of Functional Chromosome Organization in Danaus plexippus.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Altering enhancer-promoter linear distance impacts promoter competition in cis and in trans.Genetics · 2022Article
- Independence of chromatin conformation and gene regulation during Drosophila dorsoventral patterning.Nature genetics · 2021Article
- 3D genome evolution and reorganization in the Drosophila melanogaster species group.PLoS genetics · 2020Article
- Photosynthetic protein classification using genome neighborhood-based machine learning feature.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Highly rearranged chromosomes reveal uncoupling between genome topology and gene expression.Nature genetics · 2019Article
- Linked genetic variation and not genome structure causes widespread differential expression associated with chromosomal inversions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Engineering the Drosophila Genome for Developmental Biology.Journal of developmental biology · 2017Review
- Effects of Gene Dose, Chromatin, and Network Topology on Expression in Drosophila melanogaster.PLoS genetics · 2016Article
- Widespread Impact of Chromosomal Inversions on Gene Expression Uncovers Robustness via Phenotypic Buffering.Molecular biology and evolution · 2016Article
- The Role of Transcription Factors at Antisense-Expressing Gene Pairs in Yeast.Genome biology and evolution · 2016Article
- Expression-based segmentation of the Drosophila genome.BMC genomics · 2013Article
- Evaluation of the role of functional constraints on the integrity of an ultraconserved region in the genus Drosophila.PLoS genetics · 2012Article
- Impact of chromosomal inversions on the yeast DAL cluster.PloS one · 2012Article
- Support for multiple classes of local expression clusters in Drosophila melanogaster, but no evidence for gene order conservation.Genome biology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
It is now widely accepted that gene organisation in eukaryotic genomes is non-random and it is proposed that such organisation may be important for gene expression and genome evolution. In particular, the results of several large-scale gene expression analyses in a range of organisms from yeast to human indicate that sets of genes with similar tissue-specific or temporal expression profiles are clustered within the genome in gene expression neighbourhoods. While the existence of neighbourhoods is clearly established, the underlying reason for this facet of genome organisation is currently unclear and there is little experimental evidence that addresses the genomic requisites for neighbourhood organisation. We report the targeted disruption of three well-defined male-specific gene expression neighbourhoods in the Drosophila genome by the synthesis of precisely mapped chromosomal inversions. We compare gene expression in individuals carrying inverted chromosomes with their non-inverted but otherwise identical progenitors using whole-transcriptome microarray analysis, validating these data with specific quantitative real-time PCR assays. For each neighbourhood we generate and examine multiple inversions. We find no significant differences in the expression of genes that define each of the neighbourhoods. We further show that the inversions spatially separate both halves of a neighbourhood in the nucleus. Thus, models explaining neighbourhood organisation in terms of local sequence interactions, enhancer crosstalk, or short-range chromatin effects are unlikely to account for this facet of genome organisation. Our study challenges the notion that, at least in the case of the testis, expression neighbourhoods are a feature of eukaryotic genome organisation necessary for correct gene expression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.