Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21151205›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2011

Beyond chemotherapy: new agents for targeted treatment of lymphoma.

Anas Younes

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Extracellular Vesicles: New Players in Lymphomas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The landscape of new drugs in lymphoma.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2017
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The IL-15-Based ALT-803 Complex Enhances FcγRIIIa-Triggered NK Cell Responses and In Vivo Clearance of B Cell Lymphomas.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Anas YounesDepartment of Lymphoma and Myeloma, Unit 429, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA. ayounes@mdanderson.org

Funding

UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Lymphoma SPOREP50CA136411 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BERRY, DONALD A · 2009 to 2011
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS 1P50CA136411-01A1NCI NIH HHS P50 CA136411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An improved understanding of the molecular biology of cancer cell growth and survival and the role of the microenvironment in supporting the survival of cancer cells, including lymphoma cells, has led to the identification of a number of potential therapeutic targets. Despite these advances, drug development for lymphoma remains slow, inefficient, and frequently unfocused. Future work should focus on identifying 'driver' molecular defects of oncogenic pathways that can be targeted therapeutically, discovering predictive biomarkers for treatment response, and prioritizing promising drugs to accelerate their approval. This Review summarizes the current development status of novel agents for lymphoma and discusses strategies to move the field forward.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorHumansLymphomaAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID21151205
PMCPMC3192435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.