Trial reportBone marrow transplantation2011
Phase-2 trial of an intensified conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant for poor-risk leukemia.
Trial report in Bone marrow transplantation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia not in complete remission: outcomes and prognostic factors in a contemporary cohort.Blood cancer journal · 2025Article
- Fifty years of BMT: risk stratification, donor matching, and stem cell collection for transplantation.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Role of Radiation Based Conditioning Regimens in Patients With High-Risk AML Undergoing Allogenic Transplantation in Remission or Active Disease and Mechanisms of Post-Transplant Relapse.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Comparison of High Doses of Total Body Irradiation in Myeloablative Conditioning before Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2019Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with poor-risk leukemia have a high relapse rate despite allogeneic transplant. We report on the phase-2 trial of an intensified allogeneic transplant regimen whose aim was tolerable toxicity and durable remission. Study patients (n=30) had unfavorable first remission cytogenetics, progression from myelodysplasia or active disease due to induction failure or relapse. Conditioning was i.v. BU, targeted to a first-dose plasma area under the curve (AUC) of 700-900 μM min, VP-16 at 30 mg/kg of adjusted ideal body weight and fractionated TBI (FTBI) at 1200 cGy in 10 fractions. GVHD prophylaxis was CsA and mycophenolate mofetil. Regimen-related toxicities (Bearman) included grade II mucositis in 29 patients (97%) and grade III in one patient, grade II-III sinusoidal obstructive syndrome in 2 patients (7%), and grade 2-3 (CTC) skin toxicity in 8 patients (27%). The 30- and 100-day TRMs were 0 and 7% respectively. The median follow-up was 83.7 months (60.7-96.4) for surviving patients. The 5-year overall and disease-free survival was 40% for all patients. Cumulative 5-year relapse incidence (RI) was 23% and TRM was 37%. We have shown promising OS and RI in these poor-risk patients, who typically have few curative options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.