Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21150890›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2011

Phenotypic manifestations of copy number variation in chromosome 16p13.11.

Sandesh C Sreenath Nagamani, Ayelet Erez, Patricia Bader, Seema R Lalani, Daryl A Scott, Fernando Scaglia, Sharon E Plon, Chun-Hui Tsai, Tyler Reimschisel, Elizabeth Roeder and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in genetics · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sandesh C Sreenath NagamaniDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Ayelet Erez
Patricia Bader
Seema R Lalani
Daryl A Scott
Fernando Scaglia
Sharon E Plon
Chun-Hui Tsai
Tyler Reimschisel
Elizabeth Roeder
Amy D Malphrus
Patricia A Eng
Patricia M Hixson
Sung-Hae L Kang
Pawel Stankiewicz
Ankita Patel
Sau Wai Cheung
Baylor College of Medicine · USBoston Children's Hospital · USParkview Health · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

MEDICAL GENETICS RESEARCH FELLOWSHIP PROGRAMT32GM007526 · NIGMS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Brendan Lee · 1985 to 2026
$11.4M
Genomic Approaches to Defining Inherited Basis of Childhood CancerR01CA138836 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI PLON, SHARON E. · 2010 to 2012
$1.7M
Metabolite channeling in the urea cycle and production of nitric oxideK08DK081735 · NIDDK · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI EREZ, AYELET · 2009 to 2012
$449k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA138836NIDDK NIH HHS DK081735-01A1NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK081735NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007526NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM07526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The widespread clinical utilization of array comparative genome hybridization, has led to the unraveling of many new copy number variations (CNVs). Although some of these CNVs are clearly pathogenic, the phenotypic consequences of others, such as those in 16p13.11 remain unclear. Whereas deletions of 16p13.11 have been associated with multiple congenital anomalies, the relevance of duplications of the region is still being debated. We report detailed clinical and molecular characterization of 10 patients with duplication and 4 patients with deletion of 16p13.11. We found that patients with duplication of the region have varied clinical features including behavioral abnormalities, cognitive impairment, congenital heart defects and skeletal manifestations, such as hypermobility, craniosynostosis and polydactyly. These features were incompletely penetrant. Patients with deletion of the region presented with microcephaly, developmental delay and behavioral abnormalities as previously described. The CNVs were of varying sizes and were likely mediated by non-allelic homologous recombination between low copy repeats. Our findings expand the repertoire of clinical features observed in patients with CNV in 16p13.11 and strengthen the hypothesis that this is a dosage sensitive region with clinical relevance.

Indexed as

Chromosome DeletionChromosome DuplicationPhenotypeAbnormalities, MultipleChildChromosomes, Human, Pair 16Cohort StudiesComparative Genomic HybridizationDevelopmental DisabilitiesFemaleHumansInfantMaleMicrocephalySegmental Duplications, Genomic

Identifiers

PMID21150890
PMCPMC3061988
OpenAlexW2070811374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.