ReviewThe Indian journal of medical research2010
Clinical judgement & evidence-based medicine: time for reconciliation.
Review in The Indian journal of medical research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Certainty and systematicity of practice-derived evidence matter for its relative importance in professional decision-making: Survey results on the role of proven experience in Swedish medicine, nursing, OT, dentistry, and dental hygiene.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2022Article
- Clinical and diagnostic color-coding in ophthalmology - An indispensable educational tool for ophthalmologists.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022Review
- Telemental Health Collaborative Care Medication Management: Implementation and Outcomes.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2022Article
- Daily versus weekly evidence reports for orthopaedic surgeons in India: A mixed-methods study.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2019Article
- Patient blood management in obstetrics: prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage. A NATA consensus statement.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2019Article
- Development of the Wheelchair Interface Questionnaire and initial face and content validity.African journal of disability · 2019Article
- Can a mobile app improve the quality of patient care provided by trainee doctors? Analysis of trainees' case reports.BMJ open · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a popular perception that clinical judgement and evidence-based medicine are at loggerheads with each other. We examine the concepts of evidence and judgment as applied to clinical practice, and attempt to understand the reasons behind this imaginary divide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.