Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21149676›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2010

Robust circadian clocks from coupled protein-modification and transcription-translation cycles.

David Zwicker, David K Lubensky, Pieter Rein ten Wolde

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Circadian regulation of metabolism across photosynthetic organisms.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Energy dissipation bounds for autonomous thermodynamic cycles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Timing the day: what makes bacterial clocks tick?Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Discrete gene replication events drive coupling between the cell cycle and circadian clocks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  20. Toward Multiscale Models of Cyanobacterial Growth: A Modular Approach.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

David ZwickerFOM (Stichting voor Fundamenteel Onderzoek der Materie) Institute for Atomic and Molecular Physics (AMOLF), Science Park 104, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
David K Lubensky
Pieter Rein ten Wolde
Institute for Atomic and Molecular Physics · NLUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus uses both a protein phosphorylation cycle and a transcription-translation cycle to generate circadian rhythms that are highly robust against biochemical noise. We use stochastic simulations to analyze how these cycles interact to generate stable rhythms in growing, dividing cells. We find that a protein phosphorylation cycle by itself is robust when protein turnover is low. For high decay or dilution rates (and compensating synthesis rates), however, the phosphorylation-based oscillator loses its integrity. Circadian rhythms thus cannot be generated with a phosphorylation cycle alone when the growth rate, and consequently the rate of protein dilution, is high enough; in practice, a purely posttranslational clock ceases to function well when the cell doubling time drops below the 24-h clock period. At higher growth rates, a transcription-translation cycle becomes essential for generating robust circadian rhythms. Interestingly, although a transcription-translation cycle is necessary to sustain a phosphorylation cycle at high growth rates, a phosphorylation cycle can dramatically enhance the robustness of a transcription-translation cycle at lower protein decay or dilution rates. In fact, the full oscillator built from these two tightly intertwined cycles far outperforms not just each of its two components individually, but also a hypothetical system in which the two parts are coupled as in textbook models of coupled phase oscillators. Our analysis thus predicts that both cycles are required to generate robust circadian rhythms over the full range of growth conditions.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBacterial ProteinsCell CycleCircadian ClocksCircadian RhythmCircadian Rhythm Signaling Peptides and ProteinsModels, BiologicalPhosphorylationProtein BiosynthesisProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalStochastic ProcessesSynechococcusTime FactorsTranscription, GeneticBacterial ProteinsCircadian Rhythm Signaling Peptides and ProteinsKaiA protein, cyanobacteriaKaiB protein, cyanobacteriaKaiC protein, cyanobacteria

Identifiers

PMID21149676
PMCPMC3012469
OpenAlexW2057903322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.