Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21149591›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2011

Differential effects of three canonical Toxoplasma strains on gene expression in human neuroepithelial cells.

Jianchun Xiao, Lorraine Jones-Brando, C Conover Talbot, Robert H Yolken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mucosal Administration of Recombinant Baculovirus DisplayingFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  6. PersistentInfection and immunity · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Mechanisms of Human Innate Immune Evasion byFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2019
    Review
  9. Review
  10. A NewScientifica · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Patterns of Hydrocephalus Caused by Congenital Toxoplasma gondii Infection Associate With Parasite Genetics.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jianchun XiaoStanley Division of Developmental Neurovirology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, 1105 Blalock, Baltimore, MD 21287-4933, USA.
Lorraine Jones-Brando
C Conover Talbot
Robert H Yolken

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strain type is one of the key factors suspected to play a role in determining the outcome of Toxoplasma infection. In this study, we examined the transcriptional profile of human neuroepithelioma cells in response to representative strains of Toxoplasma by using microarray analysis to characterize the strain-specific host cell response. The study of neural cells is of interest in light of the ability of Toxoplasma to infect the brain and to establish persistent infection within the central nervous system. We found that the extents of the expression changes varied considerably among the three strains. Neuroepithelial cells infected with Toxoplasma type I exhibited the highest level of differential gene expression, whereas type II-infected cells had a substantially smaller number of genes which were differentially expressed. Cells infected with type III exhibited intermediate effects on gene expression. The three strains also differed in the individual genes and gene pathways which were altered following cellular infection. For example, gene ontology (GO) analysis indicated that type I infection largely affects genes related to the central nervous system, while type III infection largely alters genes which affect nucleotide metabolism; type II infection does not alter the expression of a clearly defined set of genes. Moreover, Ingenuity Pathways Analysis (IPA) suggests that the three lineages differ in the ability to manipulate their host; e.g., they employ different strategies to avoid, deflect, or subvert host defense mechanisms. These observed differences may explain some of the variation in the neurobiological effects of different strains of Toxoplasma on infected individuals.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingCell LineGene ExpressionHumansNeuroepithelial CellsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionToxoplasmaToxoplasmosis

Identifiers

PMID21149591
PMCPMC3067490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.