Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21149261›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2011

A new framework for identifying cis-regulatory motifs in prokaryotes.

Guojun Li, Bingqiang Liu, Qin Ma, Ying Xu

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Guojun LiComputational Systems Biology Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Bingqiang Liu
Qin Ma
Ying Xu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a new algorithm, BOBRO, for prediction of cis-regulatory motifs in a given set of promoter sequences. The algorithm substantially improves the prediction accuracy and extends the scope of applicability of the existing programs based on two key new ideas: (i) we developed a highly effective method for reliably assessing the possibility for each position in a given promoter to be the (approximate) start of a conserved sequence motif; and (ii) we developed a highly reliable way for recognition of actual motifs from the accidental ones based on the concept of 'motif closure'. These two key ideas are embedded in a classical framework for motif finding through finding cliques in a graph but have made this framework substantially more sensitive as well as more selective in motif finding in a very noisy background. A comparative analysis shows that the performance coefficient was improved from 29% to 41% by our program compared to the best among other six state-of-the-art prediction tools on a large-scale data sets of promoters from one genome, and also consistently improved by substantial margins on another kind of large-scale data sets of orthologous promoters across multiple genomes. The power of BOBRO in dealing with noisy data was further demonstrated through identification of the motifs of the global transcriptional regulators by running it over 2390 promoter sequences of Escherichia coli K12.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsPromoter Regions, GeneticBacteriaBase SequenceConserved SequenceEscherichia coli K12Gene Expression RegulationGenome, BacterialSequence Analysis, DNASoftwareTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID21149261
PMCPMC3074163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.