ReviewEukaryotic cell2011
Initial cell type choice in Dictyostelium.
Review in Eukaryotic cell, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- On the origin of the functional versatility of macrophages.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Diversity of bet-hedging strategies in microbial communities-Recent cases and insights.WIREs mechanisms of disease · 2022Review
- Evolution of Reproductive Division of Labor - Lessons Learned From the Social AmoebaFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Possible Involvement of the Nutrient and Energy Sensors mTORC1 and AMPK in Cell Fate Diversification in a Non-Metazoan Organism.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Article
- Precarious development: the uncertain social life of cellular slime molds.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015Article
- Neuronal specification exploits the inherent flexibility of cell-cycle gap phases.Neurogenesis (Austin, Tex.) · 2015Article
- The cyclin-dependent kinase family in the social amoebozoan Dictyostelium discoideum.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2014Review
- Secondary ion mass spectrometry imaging of Dictyostelium discoideum aggregation streams.PloS one · 2014Article
- Evolution of cooperation and control of cheating in a social microbe.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Much remains to be understood about how a group of cells break symmetry and differentiate into distinct cell types. The simple eukaryote Dictyostelium discoideum is an excellent model system for studying questions such as cell type differentiation. Dictyostelium cells grow as single cells. When the cells starve, they aggregate to develop into a multicellular structure with only two main cell types: spore and stalk. There has been a longstanding controversy as to how a cell makes the initial choice of becoming a spore or stalk cell. In this review, we describe how the controversy arose and how a consensus developed around a model in which initial cell type choice in Dictyostelium is dependent on the cell cycle phase that a cell happens to be in at the time that it starves.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.