Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21148637›Full record

GuidelineBritish journal of anaesthesia2011

Detection, evaluation, and management of preoperative anaemia in the elective orthopaedic surgical patient: NATA guidelines.

L T Goodnough, A Maniatis, P Earnshaw, G Benoni, P Beris, E Bisbe, D A Fergusson, H Gombotz, O Habler, T G Monk and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readPractice GuidelineSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Guideline in British journal of anaesthesia, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 140 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
140citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

140 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 536 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The impact of anemia on early postoperative complications in aseptic revision total shoulder arthroplasty.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  20. Review

80 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 11 institutions in 10 countries.

L T GoodnoughDepartment of Pathology and Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Pasteur Dr., Stanford, CA 94305, USA. ltgoodno@stanford.edu
A Maniatis
P Earnshaw
G Benoni
P Beris
E Bisbe
D A Fergusson
H Gombotz
O Habler
T G Monk
Y Ozier
R Slappendel
M Szpalski
Duke Medical Center · USHenry Dunant Hospital · GRHôpitaux Iris Sud · BEHospital de l'Esperança · ESKrankenhaus Nordwest · DELund University · SEStanford University · USSt Thomas' Hospital · GBUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHWomen's General Hospital · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previously undiagnosed anaemia is common in elective orthopaedic surgical patients and is associated with increased likelihood of blood transfusion and increased perioperative morbidity and mortality. A standardized approach for the detection, evaluation, and management of anaemia in this setting has been identified as an unmet medical need. A multidisciplinary panel of physicians was convened by the Network for Advancement of Transfusion Alternatives (NATA) with the aim of developing practice guidelines for the detection, evaluation, and management of preoperative anaemia in elective orthopaedic surgery. A systematic literature review and critical evaluation of the evidence was performed, and recommendations were formulated according to the method proposed by the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group. We recommend that elective orthopaedic surgical patients have a haemoglobin (Hb) level determination 28 days before the scheduled surgical procedure if possible (Grade 1C). We suggest that the patient's target Hb before elective surgery be within the normal range, according to the World Health Organization criteria (Grade 2C). We recommend further laboratory testing to evaluate anaemia for nutritional deficiencies, chronic renal insufficiency, and/or chronic inflammatory disease (Grade 1C). We recommend that nutritional deficiencies be treated (Grade 1C). We suggest that erythropoiesis-stimulating agents be used for anaemic patients in whom nutritional deficiencies have been ruled out, corrected, or both (Grade 2A). Anaemia should be viewed as a serious and treatable medical condition, rather than simply an abnormal laboratory value. Implementation of anaemia management in the elective orthopaedic surgery setting will improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Orthopedic ProceduresAlgorithmsAnemiaElective Surgical ProceduresHumansPreoperative Care

Identifiers

PMID21148637
PMCPMC3000629
OpenAlexW2143449839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.