ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2010
Derivation, validation, and evaluation of a new QRISK model to estimate lifetime risk of cardiovascular disease: cohort study using QResearch database.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03453398 (Effects of Shift Work on Health), which is not on this map. Cited by 148 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effects of Shift Work on Health: Assessment of Sleep Quality, Motor Control and Cardiovascular Risk.
Who cites it
148 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Opportunities and challenges in developing risk prediction models with electronic health records data: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017Pooled it
- Prediction models for cardiovascular disease risk in the general population: systematic review.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2016Pooled it
- Systematic review: antihypertensive drug therapy in patients of African and South Asian ethnicity.Internal and emergency medicine · 2016Pooled it
- Impact analysis studies of clinical prediction rules relevant to primary care: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2016Pooled it
- Atrial fibrillation as risk factor for cardiovascular disease and death in women compared with men: systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2016Pooled it
- Study of cardiovascular disease prediction model based on random forest in eastern China.Scientific reports · 2020Trial
- Estimated Stroke-Free Survival of Folic Acid Therapy for Hypertensive Adults: Projection Based on the CSPPT.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2020Trial
- A cardiovascular risk prediction model for older people: Development and validation in a primary care population.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2019Trial
- Cardiovascular risk at health checks performed opportunistically or following an invitation letter. Cohort study.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2018Trial
- Modelling total coronary heart disease burden and long-term benefit of cholesterol lowering in middle aged men with and without a history of cardiovascular disease.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2017Trial
- Acute benefits of the microbial-derived isoflavone metabolite equol on arterial stiffness in men prospectively recruited according to equol producer phenotype: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2016Trial
- Blood pressure and incidence of twelve cardiovascular diseases: lifetime risks, healthy life-years lost, and age-specific associations in 1·25 million people.Lancet (London, England) · 2014Trial
- Genetic markers enhance coronary risk prediction in men: the MORGAM prospective cohorts.PloS one · 2012Trial
- Inherited risk of coronary artery disease: redefining care with imaging and genetics.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Multimodal Fusion of Echocardiogram Images and Electronic Medical Records for Heart Disease Screening: Retrospective Algorithm Development and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Potential of earlier primary care health checks for prevention of cardiovascular events in younger age groups: population-based study in the United Kingdom.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- DNA Methylation Algorithms of Aging and Incident Cardiovascular Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Article
- Epidemiological and Clinical Characteristics of Acute Stroke in a Multi-Ethnic South Asian Population.Neurology international · 2025Article
- Assessing the value for money, from a policy maker perspective, of 24 randomised controlled trial designs for an online weight maintenance guided self-help intervention: an expected value of sample information analysis.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2025Article
88 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop, validate, and evaluate a new QRISK model to estimate lifetime risk of cardiovascular disease.
designProspective cohort study with routinely collected data from general practice. Cox proportional hazards models in the derivation cohort to derive risk equations accounting for competing risks. Measures of calibration and discrimination in the validation cohort.
setting563 general practices in England and Wales contributing to the QResearch database. SUBJECTS: Patients aged 30-84 years who were free of cardiovascular disease and not taking statins between 1 January 1994 and 30 April 2010: 2 343 759 in the derivation dataset, and 1 267 159 in the validation dataset. Main outcomes measures Individualised estimate of lifetime risk of cardiovascular disease accounting for smoking status, ethnic group, systolic blood pressure, ratio of total cholesterol:high density lipoprotein cholesterol, body mass index, family history of coronary heart disease in first degree relative aged <60 years, Townsend deprivation score, treated hypertension, rheumatoid arthritis, chronic renal disease, type 2 diabetes, and atrial fibrillation. Age-sex centile values for lifetime cardiovascular risk compared with 10 year risk estimated using QRISK2 (2010).
resultsAcross all the 1 267 159 patients in the validation dataset, the 50th, 75th, 90th, and 95th centile values for lifetime risk were 31%, 39%, 50%, and 57% respectively. Of the 10% of patients in the validation cohort classified at highest risk with either the lifetime risk model or the 10 year risk model, only 18 385(14.5%) were at high risk on both measures. Patients identified as high risk with the lifetime risk approach were more likely to be younger, male, from ethnic minority groups, and have a positive family history of premature coronary heart disease than those identified with the 10 year QRISK2 score. The lifetime risk calculator is available at www.qrisk.org/lifetime/.
conclusionsCompared with using a 10 year QRISK2 score, a lifetime risk score will tend to identify patients for intervention at a younger age. Although lifestyle interventions at an earlier age could be advantageous, there would be small gains under the age of 65, and medical interventions carry risks as soon as they are initiated. Research is needed to examine closely the cost effectiveness and acceptability of such an approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.