Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21148122›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2011

Melanoma incidence rates among whites in the U.S. Military.

Jing Zhou, Lindsey Enewold, Shelia H Zahm, Susan S Devesa, William F Anderson, John F Potter, Katherine A McGlynn, Kangmin Zhu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Incidence rates of bladder and kidney cancers among US military servicemen: comparison with the rates in the general US population.European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Occupational Exposures and Environmental Health Hazards of Military Personnel.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Inhibitory Effect ofBioMed research international · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jing ZhouUnited States Military Cancer Institute, Washington, District of Columbia 20307, USA.
Lindsey Enewold
Shelia H Zahm
Susan S Devesa
William F Anderson
John F Potter
Katherine A McGlynn
Kangmin Zhu
Cancer Institute (WIA) · INDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics

Funding

Studies of Rare CancersZIACP010158 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI MCGLYNN, KATHERINE · 2009 to 2025
$19.1M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA CP010158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe U.S. Military and general populations may differ in the exposure to sunlight and other risk factors for melanoma and therefore the incidence rates of melanoma may be different in these two populations. However, few studies have compared melanoma incidence rates and trends over time between the military and the general population.

methodsMelanoma incidence rates from 1990 to 2004 among white active-duty military personnel and the general U.S. population were compared using data from the Department of Defense Automated Central Tumor Registry and the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program.

resultsAge-adjusted melanoma rates overall were significantly lower in the military than in the general population; the incidence rate ratio was 0.75 for men and 0.56 for women. Age-specific rates, however, were significantly lower among individuals younger than 45 years, but significantly higher among those 45 years or older (P < 0.05). Melanoma incidence increased from 1990-1994 to 2000-2004 in both populations, with the most rapid increase (40%) among younger men in the military. Melanoma incidence rates also varied by branch of military service; rates were highest in the air force.

conclusionThese results suggest that melanoma incidence rate patterns differ between the military and the general population. IMPACT: Further studies of risk factors for melanoma in the military are needed to explain these findings.

Indexed as

Military PersonnelAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSEER ProgramSkin NeoplasmsSunlightUnited StatesWhite PeopleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID21148122
PMCPMC4148910
OpenAlexW2128163550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.