Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21148101›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2011

Redrawing the Ramachandran plot after inclusion of hydrogen-bonding constraints.

Lauren L Porter, George D Rose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. 50 years in the shadow of the Ramachandran plot.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Insight into the High-Efficiency Benzo(a)pyrene Degradation Ability ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Current Approaches in Supersecondary Structures Investigation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A closer look into the α-helix basin.Scientific reports · 2016
    Article
  14. Tertiary alphabet for the observable protein structural universe.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lauren L PorterT. C. Jenkins Department of Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
George D Rose

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A protein backbone has two degrees of conformational freedom per residue, described by its ϕ,ψ-angles. Accordingly, the energy landscape of a blocked peptide unit can be mapped in two dimensions, as shown by Ramachandran, Sasisekharan, and Ramakrishnan almost half a century ago. With atoms approximated as hard spheres, the eponymous Ramachandran plot demonstrated that steric clashes alone eliminate 3/4 of ϕ,ψ-space, a result that has guided all subsequent work. Here, we show that adding hydrogen-bonding constraints to these steric criteria eliminates another substantial region of ϕ,ψ-space for a blocked peptide; for conformers within this region, an amide hydrogen is solvent-inaccessible, depriving it of a hydrogen-bonding partner. Yet, this "forbidden" region is well populated in folded proteins, which can provide longer-range intramolecular hydrogen-bond partners for these otherwise unsatisfied polar groups. Consequently, conformational space expands under folding conditions, a paradigm-shifting realization that prompts an experimentally verifiable conjecture about likely folding pathways.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularProtein ConformationProtein FoldingAmidesDatabases, ProteinHydrogen BondingMolecular Dynamics SimulationAmides

Identifiers

PMID21148101
PMCPMC3017185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.