Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21147794›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2011

MAOA-L carriers are better at making optimal financial decisions under risk.

Cary Frydman, Colin Camerer, Peter Bossaerts, Antonio Rangel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. The Genetics of Risk Aversion: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Dopaminergic Modulation of Decision Making and Subjective Well-Being.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Differential susceptibility effects of theFrontiers in psychiatry · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Reward-specific satiety affects subjective value signals in orbitofrontal cortex during multicomponent economic choice.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Endogenous fluctuations in the dopaminergic midbrain drive behavioral choice variability.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  19. Context-dependent sensitivity to losses: Range and skew manipulations.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2019
    Article
  20. Motor Cortex Excitability Reflects the Subjective Value of Reward and Mediates Its Effects on Incentive-Motivated Performance.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cary FrydmanHSS, California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Boulevard, Caltech 228-77, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Colin Camerer
Peter Bossaerts
Antonio Rangel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genes can affect behaviour towards risks through at least two distinct neurocomputational mechanisms: they may affect the value assigned to different risky options, or they may affect the way in which the brain adjudicates between options based on their value. We combined methods from neuroeconomics and behavioural genetics to investigate the impact that the genes encoding for monoamine oxidase-A (MAOA), the serotonin transporter (5-HTT) and the dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) have on these two computations. Consistent with previous literature, we found that carriers of the MAOA-L polymorphism were more likely to take financial risks. Our computational choice model, rooted in established decision theory, showed that MAOA-L carriers exhibited such behaviour because they are able to make better financial decisions under risk, and not because they are more impulsive. In contrast, we found no behavioural or computational differences among the 5-HTT and DRD4 polymorphisms.

Indexed as

Decision MakingPolymorphism, GeneticRisk-TakingAdultGenotypeHumansMaleModels, BiologicalMonoamine OxidaseReceptors, Dopamine D4Serotonin Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsStudentsYoung AdultMonoamine OxidaseReceptors, Dopamine D4Serotonin Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21147794
PMCPMC3107654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.