Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21147162›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2011

Threat detection, precautionary responses, and anxiety disorders.

Dan J Stein, Randolph M Nesse

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Are All Anxieties Created Equal? Stress-related Networks and Anxiety Phenotypes in Old Age.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. An evolutionary medicine perspective on pain and its disorders.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Methodological issues in the use of individual brain measures to index trait liabilities: The example of noise-probe P3.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dan J SteinUniversity of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. dan.stein@uct.ac.za
Randolph M Nesse
University of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study of the anxiety disorders may be a particularly useful vehicle for demonstrating how foundational sciences (e.g. cognitive-affective neuroscience, evolutionary psychology) can advance psychiatric theory and research. Here we consider important potential advances and remaining future challenges when basic research on threat detection and precautionary responses is used to address the anxiety disorders. We emphasize the potential value of a model of threat detection and precautionary responses that integrates cognitive-affective neuroscience and evolutionary approaches for understanding the anxiety disorders. However, we also suggest that substantial additional work is needed in order to link systematically the psychobiological mechanisms posited by basic work on threat detection and precautionary responses to the complex phenomena seen in the clinic.

Indexed as

Risk Reduction BehaviorSocial PerceptionAgonistic BehaviorAnimalsAnxiety DisordersBiological EvolutionBrainCognitionHumansModels, PsychologicalRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID21147162
OpenAlexW2093668396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.