Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21144659›Full record

Trial reportPain2011

An investigation of the development of analgesic tolerance to TENS in humans.

Richard E Liebano, Barbara Rakel, Carol G T Vance, Deirdre M Walsh, Kathleen A Sluka

5 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pain, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01888640 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Fibromyalgia Activity Study With Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation

TypeinterventionalSponsorKathleen SlukaRan2013 to 2018Enrolled301ConditionsFibromyalgiaArmsTENS
NCT03475082 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2012, after this paper: background citation

Use of Modulating Frequency or Increasing Intensity to Overcome Analgesic Tolerance to Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in Healthy Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorKathleen SlukaRan2012 to 2021Enrolled40ConditionsPainArmsTranscutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation
NCT03531541 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Cervical Joint Manipulation on Pressure Pain Threshold

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade Federal de Sao CarlosRan2018 to 2019Enrolled144ConditionsPainArmsApplication of TENS, CJM, Placebo TENS, Placebo CJM
NCT03541538 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Hypoalgesic Effects of Specific vs Non-specific Cervical Manipulation in Healthy Subjects

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade Federal de Sao CarlosRan2018 to 2018Enrolled21ConditionsPainArmsGlobal manipulation, Especific manipulation
NCT05362383 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for the Recovery of Oral Function After Orthognathic Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad Complutense de MadridRan2013 to 2020Enrolled47ConditionsOrthognathic Surgery, Physiology, Transcutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationArmstranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS):Enraf Nonius® S82 model
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for acute pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Effects of Using High-Frequency TENS During an Exercise Therapy Program in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Richard E LiebanoUniversity of the City of Sao Paulo, Physical Therapy Department, Sao Paulo, Brazil University of Iowa, College of Nursing, Iowa City, IA 52242-1121, USA University of Iowa, College of Medicine, Graduate Program in Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Iowa City, IA 52242-1121, USA University of Ulster, Health and Rehabilitation Sciences Research Institute, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland, UK.
Barbara Rakel
Carol G T Vance
Deirdre M Walsh
Kathleen A Sluka
University of Iowa · USUniversity of Ulster · GB

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF IOWA CTSA FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024979 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI ROSENTHAL, GARY E · 2007 to 2011
$31.8M
Effect of TENS on Knee Osteoarthritis Pain, Hyperalgesia, and FunctionR03NR010405 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI RAKEL, BARBARA · 2007 to 2008
$144k
NCRR NIH HHS 5 UL1RR024979-3NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024979NINR NIH HHS R03 NR010405NINR NIH HHS R03NR010405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a noninvasive modality used to control pain. Animal models show that repeated TENS application produces analgesic tolerance and cross-tolerance at spinal opioid receptors. The aim of the present investigation was to examine whether repeated application of TENS produces analgesic tolerance in humans. One hundred healthy subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups: control, placebo, low-frequency (4Hz) or high-frequency (100Hz) TENS. TENS was applied daily for 5days to the nondominant upper limb; pressure-pain threshold (PPT) measurements were recorded before and after TENS. Temporal summation to mechanical stimulation was recorded on days 1 and 5, before and after TENS. Diffuse noxious inhibitory control (DNIC) was tested on day 5 using the cold pressor test and PPT measurements. There was an initial increase in PPTs in both low- and high-frequency TENS groups when compared with placebo or control groups. However, by day 5 this TENS-induced increase in PPT did not occur, and there was no difference between active TENS and placebo or control groups. High-frequency TENS decreased temporal summation on day 1 when compared with day 5. DNIC increased the PPT similarly in all groups. These data suggest that repeated daily application of TENS results in a decrease in its hypoalgesic effect by the fifth day and that the tolerance-like effect to repeated TENS results from tolerance at centrally located opioid receptors. The lack of change in DNIC response suggests that TENS and DNIC utilize separate pathways to produce analgesia. Repeated high-frequency and low-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation produce analgesic tolerance in humans by the fourth and fifth day of treatment, respectively.

Indexed as

Pain ManagementAdolescentAdultAnalgesiaDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPainPlacebo EffectTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID21144659
PMCPMC3027071
OpenAlexW2047542701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.