Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21144189›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2010

Advance care planning for cancer patients in primary care: a feasibility study.

Kirsty Boyd, Bruce Mason, Marilyn Kendall, Stephen Barclay, David Chinn, Keri Thomas, Aziz Sheikh, Scott A Murray

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Exploring advance care planning awareness, experiences, and preferences of people with cancer and support people: an Australian online cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  19. Advance Care Planning Conversations in the Oncology Setting: Tips from the Experts.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kirsty BoydPrimary Palliative Care Research Group, Edinburgh. kirsty.boyd@ed.ac.uk
Bruce Mason
Marilyn Kendall
Stephen Barclay
David Chinn
Keri Thomas
Aziz Sheikh
Scott A Murray
Primary Health Care · QA

Funding

Cancer Research UK C18005/A9742
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvance care planning is being promoted as a central component of end-of-life policies in many developed countries, but there is concern that professionals find its implementation challenging.

aimTo assess the feasibility of implementing advance care planning in UK primary care. DESIGN OF STUDY: Mixed methods evaluation of a pilot educational intervention.

settingFour general practices in south-east Scotland.

methodInterviews with 20 GPs and eight community nurses before and after a practice-based workshop; this was followed by telephone interviews with nine other GPs with a special interest in palliative care from across the UK.

resultsEnd-of-life care planning for patients typically starts as an urgent response to clear evidence of a short prognosis, and aims to achieve a 'good death'. Findings suggest that there were multiple barriers to earlier planning: prognostic uncertainty; limited collaboration with secondary care; a desire to maintain hope; and resistance to any kind of 'tick-box' approach. Following the workshop, participants' knowledge and skills were enhanced but there was little evidence of more proactive planning. GPs from other parts of the UK described confusion over terminology and were concerned about the difficulties of implementing inflexible, policy-driven care.

conclusionA clear divide was found between UK policy directives and delivery of end-of-life care in the community that educational interventions targeting primary care professionals are unlikely to address. Advance care planning has the potential to promote autonomy and shared decision making about end-of-life care, but this will require a significant shift in attitudes.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningAttitude of Health PersonnelFeasibility StudiesGeneral PracticeHumansTerminal Care

Identifiers

PMID21144189
PMCPMC2991761
OpenAlexW2122963222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.