Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21143502›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2011

Tobramycin disposition in ICU patients receiving a once daily regimen: population approach and dosage simulations.

Jean-Marie Conil, Bernard Georges, Stéphanie Ruiz, Thomas Rival, Thierry Seguin, Pierre Cougot, Olivier Fourcade, Georges Houin Pharmd, Sylvie Saivin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jean-Marie ConilPôle d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital de Rangueil, Toulouse Cedex 9 , France.
Bernard Georges
Stéphanie Ruiz
Thomas Rival
Thierry Seguin
Pierre Cougot
Olivier Fourcade
Georges Houin Pharmd
Sylvie Saivin
Hôpital Rangueil · FRInstitut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale · FRToulouse Mathematics Institute · FRUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledWHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT? It is well known that tobramycin given as an once daily dose according to the usual recommendations needs therapeutic drug monitoring by measurement of peak and trough concentrations. In the literature, there are only few published studies on the population pharmacokinetics of once daily tobramycin in critically ill patients. Glomerular filtration rate and bodyweight were identified as covariates contributing to the inter-individual variability in the disposition of aminoglycosides. The study, by Peris-Marti et al. [24], only evaluated the pharmacodynamic effectiveness of a 4 mg kg(-1) dose of tobramycin given once daily in critically ill patients. The authors concluded with a simulation showing that for a theoretical MIC of 1 or 2 mg l(-1) , a 7 mg kg(-1) dose was required. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: Our results confirm the high variability of tobramycin disposition in intensive care patients and consequently the possible lack of effectiveness. By using a population pharmacokinetic approach, two explicative covariates (height and Cockcroft creatinine clearance) added to a two-compartment model with proportional error, explained much of the inter-individual variability of tobramycin disposition in the critically ill patient population. In a median ICU patient, simulations were performed at various dosage regimens and peak and AUC pharmacodynamic targets could not be reached simultaneously in more than 45% of the ICU patient population. Drug monitoring is required to manage efficacy and toxicity.

aimThe aim of this study was to evaluate the disposition of tobramycin (TOB) in critically ill patients (ICU) by a population pharmacokinetic approach, to determine the covariates involved, and to simulate tobramycin dosage regimens.

methodsForty-nine adult ICU patients received TOB (5 mg kg(-1) ) once daily. NonMem modelling was performed on 32 patients. The 17 other patients were used for the qualification process by normalized prediction distribution error. Then Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) were performed.

resultsA two-compartment model with a proportional error best fitted the data. TOB total clearance (CL(TOB) ) was significantly correlated with Cockcroft creatinine clearance (COCK) and height. TOB clearance was 4.8 ± 1.9 l h(-1) (range 1.22-8.95), the volume of distribution of the central compartment was 24.7 ± 3.7 l (range 17.34-32.83) and that of the peripheral compartment and the inter-compartmental clearance were 30.6 l and 4.74 l h(-1) , respectively. Only 29% of the patients presented a target AUC between 80 and 125 mg l(-1) h and 61% were lower than 80 mg l(-1)  h. After considering COCK and height, MCS showed that only 50% of the population could achieve the target AUC for the 375 and 400 mg dosages.

conclusionEven after taking into account COCK and height, for strains with an MIC ≤ 1 mg l(-1) , MCS doses evidenced that peak and AUC pharmacodynamic targets could not be reached simultaneously in more than 45% of the ICU patient population. Combination therapy in addition to drug monitoring are required to manage efficacy and toxicity.

Indexed as

Critical CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsArea Under CurveCreatinineFemaleHumansMaleMetabolic Clearance RateMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTobramycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsCreatinineTobramycin

Identifiers

PMID21143502
PMCPMC3018027
OpenAlexW1838411867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.