Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21143498›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2011

Impact of a focussed teaching programme on practical prescribing skills among final year medical students.

Euan A Sandilands, Karen Reid, Laura Shaw, D Nicholas Bateman, David J Webb, Neeraj Dhaun, David C Kluth

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Preparing to prescribe: How do clerkship students learn in the midst of complexity?Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Teaching safe prescribing to medical students: perspectives in the UK.Advances in medical education and practice · 2015
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Euan A SandilandsNPIS Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, UK. euan.sandilands@luht.scot.nhs.uk
Karen Reid
Laura Shaw
D Nicholas Bateman
David J Webb
Neeraj Dhaun
David C Kluth

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

what is already known about this subjectMedication errors, and particularly prescribing errors, are common in UK hospitals. Junior doctors make the majority of prescribing errors. Deficiencies in prescribing education and training have been closely linked to the high frequency of medication errors. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: Focussed prescribing teaching can lead to an improvement in prescribing ability. Prescribing confidence can be significantly improved through education. Education is insufficient alone in eradicating prescribing errors.

aimTo assess the impact of prescribing teaching on final year medical students.

methodsStudents randomly allocated to two hospitals completed a prescribing assessment. Prescribing teaching was delivered to the intervention group while no additional teaching was provided for the control group. All students then completed a second prescribing assessment.

resultsTeaching improved the assessment score: mean assessment 2 vs. 1, 70% vs. 62%, P= 0.007; allergy documentation: 98% vs. 74%, P= 0.0001; and confidence. However, 30% of prescriptions continued to include prescribing errors.

conclusionMedical students make significant errors in prescribing. Teaching improves ability and confidence but is insufficient alone in eradicating errors.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceDrug PrescriptionsEducation, Medical, UndergraduateEnglandHumansMedication ErrorsStudents, Medical

Identifiers

PMID21143498
PMCPMC3018023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.