Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21142959›Full record

ReviewVector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.)2011

Potential role of pet animals in household transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a narrative review.

Manuel Bramble, Daniel Morris, Pam Tolomeo, Ebbing Lautenbach

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Antimicrobial Resistance ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  4. CanineMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  5. The Epidemiology of Animal-Associated Methicillin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Pet animals as reservoirs for spreading methicillin-resistantJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2023
    Article
  7. Antimicrobial Resistance and Molecular Epidemiology ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. The SCCVeterinary sciences · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Colonization withBioMed research international · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Manuel BrambleUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
Daniel Morris
Pam Tolomeo
Ebbing Lautenbach
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Mentoring and patient-oriented research in antimicrobial resistanceK24AI080942 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LAUTENBACH, EBBING · 2009 to 2013
$853k
NIAID NIH HHS K24AI080942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this narrative review, we found numerous reports suggesting that dogs and cats may play a role in household methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) transmission and recurrent MRSA infection in human contacts. Future work should emphasize elucidating more clearly the prevalence of MRSA in household pets and characterize transmission dynamics of MRSA humans and pet animals.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusPetsStaphylococcal InfectionsZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID21142959
PMCPMC3115421
OpenAlexW2058280609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.