Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21142822›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica2011

Time course of skeletal muscle regeneration after severe trauma.

Tobias Winkler, Philipp von Roth, Georg Matziolis, Maria R Schumann, Sebastian Hahn, Patrick Strube, Gisela Stoltenburg-Didinger, Carsten Perka, Georg N Duda, Stephan V Tohtz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. 3D Graphene Scaffolds for Skeletal Muscle Regeneration: Future Perspectives.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cell therapy to improve regeneration of skeletal muscle injuries.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Immunology Guides Skeletal Muscle Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Angiopoietin-1 enhances skeletal muscle regeneration in mice.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tobias WinklerCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Julius Wolff Institute Berlin, Charité – Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Germany. tobias.winkler@charite.de
Philipp von Roth
Georg Matziolis
Maria R Schumann
Sebastian Hahn
Patrick Strube
Gisela Stoltenburg-Didinger
Carsten Perka
Georg N Duda
Stephan V Tohtz
Berlin-Brandenburger Centrum für Regenerative Therapien · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeAnimal models of skeletal muscle injury should be thoroughly described and should mimic the clinical situation. We established a model of a critical size crush injury of the soleus muscle in rats. The aim was to describe the time course of skeletal muscle regeneration using mechanical, histological, and magnetic resonance (MR) tomographic methods.

methodsLeft soleus muscles of 36 Sprague-Dawley rats were crushed in situ in a standardized manner. We scanned the lower legs of 6 animals by 7-tesla MR one week, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after trauma. Regeneration was evaluated at these times by in vivo measurement of muscle contraction forces after fast-twitch and tetanic stimulation (groups 1W, 4W, 8W; 6 per group). Histological and immunohistological analysis was performed and the amount of fibrosis within the injured muscles was determined histomorphologically.

resultsMR signals of the traumatized soleus muscles showed a clear time course concerning microstructure and T1 and T2 signal intensity. Newly developed neural endplates and myotendinous junctions could be seen in the injured zones of the soleus. Tetanic force increased continuously, starting at 23% (SD 4) of the control side (p < 0.001) 1 week after trauma and recovering to 55% (SD 23) after 8 weeks. Fibrotic tissue occupied 40% (SD 4) of the traumatized muscles after the first week, decreased to approximately 25% after 4 weeks, and remained at this value until 8 weeks.

interpretationAt both the functional level and the morphological level, skeletal muscle regeneration follows a distinct time course. Our trauma model allows investigation of muscle regeneration after a standardized injury to muscle fibers.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalMagnetic Resonance ImagingMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRegenerationSoft Tissue InjuriesTime FactorsWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID21142822
PMCPMC3230005
OpenAlexW1827212232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.