Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21142412›Full record

ArticleAIDS research and human retroviruses2011

Outcomes of a National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Workshop on understanding HIV-exposed but seronegative individuals.

Janet M Young, Jim A Turpin, Runa Musib, Opendra K Sharma

Abstract readConference Proceedings
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS research and human retroviruses, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Cellular immune correlates analysis of an HIV-1 preexposure prophylaxis trial.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mucosal correlates of protection in HIV-1-exposed sero-negative persons.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2014
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Janet M YoungPathogenesis and Basic Research Branch, Basic Sciences Program, Division of AIDS, NIAID, NIH, HHS, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. janet@goldray.com
Jim A Turpin
Runa Musib
Opendra K Sharma

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fascinating conundrum that some individuals who are exposed to HIV in ways that would make viral transmission highly likely, yet are able to remain uninfected, has been appreciated for many years. As early as the late 1980s, reports of such individuals began appearing in the HIV/AIDS literature. Despite the critical importance of understanding possible mechanisms of natural HIV resistance for developing effective prevention strategies, numerous obstacles have prevented this essential area of scientific exploration from moving forward. The Workshop held on July 8-9, 2010 and supported by the Office of AIDS Research (OAR), the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), and the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) at the NIH hosted 200 participants and utilized the expertise of 42 AIDS researchers as invited speakers, session chairs, and discussion leaders for presentations and breakout sessions in an attempt to remove some of those obstacles. Accomplishments of the participants included developing a consensus for a new general term for the field, HIV-exposed seronegative (HESN), while recognizing the necessity to identify and utilize secondary descriptive criteria such as exposure level, risk group, duration of seronegativity, or natural resistance. Three key questions for future research were also identified by the group: (1) What is different in HESN versus those who get infected? (2) What is the immune response in HESN and is it just a marker of exposure or a correlate of protection? (3) What are the HESN host factors that help HESN resist infection? This report briefly summarizes the presentations, and describes future directions for addressing these questions and challenges.

Indexed as

Immunity, InnateBiomedical ResearchFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U.S.)Terminology as TopicUnited States

Identifiers

PMID21142412
PMCPMC3132007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.