ReviewPsychological bulletin2011
Genetic essentialism: on the deceptive determinism of DNA.
Review in Psychological bulletin, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 187 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
187 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 723 citations in OpenAlex.
- Behavioral impact of return of genetic test results for complex disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2018Pooled it
- Perceptions of ADHD Among Diagnosed Children and Their Parents: A Systematic Review Using the Common-Sense Model of Illness Representations.Clinical child and family psychology review · 2018Pooled it
- Schoolhouse risk: Can we mitigate the polygenic Pygmalion effect?Acta psychologica · 2024Trial
- Asymmetrical genetic attributions for the presence and absence of health problems.Psychology & health · 2024Trial
- How Cisgender People Define "Transgender" Is Associated with Attitudes Toward Transgender People.Archives of sexual behavior · 2023Trial
- Limited impacts of biogenetic messaging on neural correlates of cognitive control and beliefs about depression.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2023Trial
- Experimentally exploring the potential behavioral effects of personalized genetic information about marijuana and schizophrenia risk.Journal of psychiatric research · 2021Trial
- Do genetic ancestry tests increase racial essentialism? Findings from a randomized controlled trial.PloS one · 2020Trial
- Cognitive and Affective Responses to Mass-media Based Genetic Risk Information in a Socio-demographically Diverse Sample of Smokers.Journal of health communication · 2019Trial
- Testing positive for a genetic predisposition to depression magnifies retrospective memory for depressive symptoms.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2017Trial
- Genetic attributions and mental illness diagnosis: effects on perceptions of danger, social distance, and real helping decisions.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2014Trial
- Fixable or fate? Perceptions of the biology of depression.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2013Trial
- Personality factors moderate the associations between apolipoprotein genotype and cognitive function as well as late onset Alzheimer disease.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2012Trial
- Behavioral Genetics as a Public Science: Introduction to the Special Issue.Behavior genetics · 2026Article
- Is Tori seeing red? A lesson for first-year biology that unveils the complexity of phenotypic variation with pedigree analysis.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2026Article
- Using culturally responsive and sustaining course design to increase retention of underrepresented STEM undergraduates.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2026Article
- Learning about a heightened genetic risk for dementia: Expected stigma is greater than experienced stigma.Psychology and aging · 2026Article
- Rationale and Methods for the Prospective Genetic Risk Evaluation and Assessment (PROGRESS) in Autism Center at Columbia University.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Polygenic risk scores are not genetic predispositions.Nature human behaviour · 2026Article
- Association and risk prediction of 19 complex diseases with polygenic scores and socioeconomic status.Communications medicine · 2026Article
127 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This article introduces the notion of genetic essentialist biases: cognitive biases associated with essentialist thinking that are elicited when people encounter arguments that genes are relevant for a behavior, condition, or social group. Learning about genetic attributions for various human conditions leads to a particular set of thoughts regarding those conditions: they are more likely to be perceived as (a) immutable and determined, (b) having a specific etiology, (c) homogeneous and discrete, and (d) natural, which can lead to the naturalistic fallacy. There are rare cases of "strong genetic explanation" when such responses to genetic attributions may be appropriate; however, people tend to overweigh genetic attributions compared with competing attributions even in cases of "weak genetic explanation," which are far more common. The authors reviewed research on people's understanding of race, gender, sexual orientation, criminality, mental illness, and obesity through a genetic essentialism lens, highlighting attitudinal, cognitive, and behavioral changes that stem from consideration of genetic attributions as bases of these categories. Scientific and media portrayals of genetic discoveries are discussed with respect to genetic essentialism, as is the role that genetic essentialism has played (and continues to play) in various public policies, legislation, scientific endeavors, and ideological movements in recent history. Last, moderating factors and interventions to reduce the magnitude of genetic essentialism, which identify promising directions to explore in order to reduce these biases, are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.