Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21142276›Full record

ReviewPharmacoEconomics2011

Effects of reference pricing in pharmaceutical markets: a review.

Matteo Maria Galizzi, Simone Ghislandi, Marisa Miraldo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in PharmacoEconomics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Pharmaceutical pricing dynamics in an internal reference pricing system: evidence from changing drugs' reimbursements.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Introduction of therapeutic reference pricing in Slovenia and its economic consequences.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2018
    Article
  15. Ontario and New Zealand Pharmaceuticals: Cost and Coverage.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Endogenous versus exogenous generic reference pricing for pharmaceuticals.International journal of health economics and management · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. The simultaneous effects of pharmaceutical policies from payers' and patients' perspectives: Italy as a case study.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Matteo Maria GalizziDepartment of Economics, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy. galizzi@eco.unibs.it
Simone Ghislandi
Marisa Miraldo
Bocconi University · ITImperial College London · GBUniversity of Brescia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work aims to provide a systematic and updated survey of original scientific studies on the effect of the introduction of reference pricing (RP) policies in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries. We searched PubMed, EconLit and Web of Knowledge for articles on RP. We reviewed studies that met the inclusion criteria established in the search strategy. From a total of 468 references, we selected the 35 that met all of the inclusion criteria. Some common themes emerged in the literature. The first was that RP was generally associated with a decrease in the prices of the drugs subject to the policy. In particular, price drops seem to have been experienced in virtually every country that implemented a generic RP (GRP) policy. A GRP policy applies only to products with expired patents and generic competition, and clusters drugs according to chemical equivalence (same form and active compound). More significant price decreases were observed in the sub-markets in which drugs were already facing generic competition prior to RP. Price drops varied widely according to the amount of generic competition and industrial strategies: brand-named drugs originally priced above RP values decreased their prices to a greater extent. A second common theme was that both therapeutic RP (TRP) and GRP have been associated with significant and consistent savings in the first years of application. A third general result is that generic market shares significantly increased whenever the firms producing brand-named drugs did not adopt one of the following strategies: lowering prices to RP values; launching new dosages and/or formulations; or marketing substitute drugs still under patent protection. Finally, concerning TRP, although more evidence is needed, studies based on a large number of patient-level observations showed no association between the RP policy and health outcomes.

Indexed as

Drug CostsCommerceCosts and Cost AnalysisDrug IndustryEconomic CompetitionEconomics, PharmaceuticalHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID21142276
OpenAlexW1492815770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.