Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21139566›Full record

ArticleThe EMBO journal2011

A positively charged channel within the Smc1/Smc3 hinge required for sister chromatid cohesion.

Alexander Kurze, Katharine A Michie, Sarah E Dixon, Ajay Mishra, Takehiko Itoh, Syma Khalid, Lana Strmecki, Katsuhiko Shirahige, Christian H Haering, Jan Löwe and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EMBO journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Phenotype ofGenes · 2025
    Article
  3. Nucleic Acids and Electrical Signals.Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Suppressor mutation analysis combined with 3D modeling explains cohesin's capacity to hold and release DNA.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The torments of the cohesin ring.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Alexander KurzeDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Katharine A Michie
Sarah E Dixon
Ajay Mishra
Takehiko Itoh
Syma Khalid
Lana Strmecki
Katsuhiko Shirahige
Christian H Haering
Jan Löwe
Kim Nasmyth
University of Oxford · GBMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GBEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory · DEThe University of Tokyo · JPTokyo Institute of Technology · JPUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UKMedical Research Council G0501615Medical Research Council MC_U105184326Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cohesin's structural maintenance of chromosome 1 (Smc1) and Smc3 are rod-shaped proteins with 50-nm long intra-molecular coiled-coil arms with a heterodimerization domain at one end and an ABC-like nucleotide-binding domain (NBD) at the other. Heterodimerization creates V-shaped molecules with a hinge at their centre. Inter-connection of NBDs by Scc1 creates a tripartite ring within which, it is proposed, sister DNAs are entrapped. To investigate whether cohesin's hinge functions as a possible DNA entry gate, we solved the crystal structure of the hinge from Mus musculus, which like its bacterial counterpart is characterized by a pseudo symmetric heterodimeric torus containing a small channel that is positively charged. Mutations in yeast Smc1 and Smc3 that together neutralize the channel's charge have little effect on dimerization or association with chromosomes, but are nevertheless lethal. Our finding that neutralization reduces acetylation of Smc3, which normally occurs during replication and is essential for cohesion, suggests that the positively charged channel is involved in a major conformational change during S phase.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularAnimalsBlotting, WesternCalorimetryCell Cycle ProteinsChondroitin Sulfate ProteoglycansChromatidsChromatin ImmunoprecipitationChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCohesinsCrystallizationDimerizationImmunoprecipitationMiceMicroscopy, FluorescencePolymerase Chain ReactionCell Cycle ProteinsChondroitin Sulfate ProteoglycansChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCohesinsSMC3 protein, mouseStructural Maintenance of Chromosome Protein 1

Identifiers

PMID21139566
PMCPMC3025461
OpenAlexW2149015451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.