Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21139435›Full record

ArticlePlant signaling & behavior2010

The regulatory network of cell-cycle progression is fundamentally different in plants versus yeast or metazoans.

Nico Dissmeyer, Annika K Weimer, Lieven De Veylder, Bela Novak, Arp Schnittger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant signaling & behavior, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cell cycle in plant development and reprogramming.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2026
    Review
  4. Mitotic Disruption and Cytoskeletal Alterations Induced byInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Connections between the Cell Cycle and the DNA Damage Response in Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. A multi-level response to DNA damage induced by aluminium.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Leaf development: a cellular perspective.Frontiers in plant science · 2014
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Diversity, classification and function of the plant protein kinase superfamily.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2012
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nico DissmeyerDepartment of Molecular Mechanisms of Phenotypic Plasticity, Institut de Biologie Moléculaire des Plantes du CNRS, IBMP-CNRS, Conventionné avec l'Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Annika K Weimer
Lieven De Veylder
Bela Novak
Arp Schnittger

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant growth and proliferation control is coming into a global focus due to recent ecological and economical developments. Plants represent not only the largest food supply for mankind but also may serve as a global source of renewable energies. However, plant breeding has to accomplish a tremendous boost in yield to match the growing demand of a still rapidly increasing human population. Moreover, breeding has to adjust to changing environmental conditions, in particular increased drought. Regulation of cell-cycle control is a major determinant of plant growth and therefore an obvious target for plant breeding. Furthermore, cell-cycle control is also crucial for the DNA damage response, for instance upon irradiation. Thus, an in-depth understanding of plant cell-cycle regulation is of importance beyond a scientific point of view. The mere presence of many conserved core cell-cycle regulators, e.g. CDKs, cyclins, or CDK inhibitors, has formed the idea that the cell cycle in plants is exactly or at least very similarly controlled as in yeast or human cells. Here together with a recent publication we demonstrate that this dogma is not true and show that the control of entry into mitosis is fundamentally different in plants versus yeast or metazoans. Our findings build an important base for the understanding and ultimate modulation of plant growth not only during unperturbed but also under harsh environmental conditions.

Indexed as

Cell CyclePlant CellsAnimalscdc25 PhosphatasesDNA DamageYeastscdc25 Phosphatases

Identifiers

PMID21139435
PMCPMC3115114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.