ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2011
Regional control and morbidity after superficial groin dissection in melanoma.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimal extent of completion lymphadenectomy for patients with melanoma and a positive sentinel node in the groin.The British journal of surgery · 2018Article
- Role of a skin bridge incision and prophylactic incisional negative-pressure wound therapy in the prevention of surgical site infection after inguinal lymph node dissection.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is no consensus about the optimal extent of surgery for patients with melanoma metastases to inguinal nodes, and this is further complicated by variations in terminology for these dissections. In patients without clinical evidence of iliac metastases, we routinely perform a superficial groin dissection (SGD), which clears node-bearing tissue superficial to the fascia lata. We hypothesized that SGD provides regional tumor control comparable to published experience with deep groin dissection (DGD) and iliac and obturator dissection (IOD), but with less morbidity. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective review of a prospectively collected database evaluated patients undergoing SGD April 1994 through May 2008. Patients with clinical evidence of iliac metastases were excluded. Clinical and pathologic data regarding recurrence and survival were evaluated.
resultsWe identified 53 primary SGD: 27 for clinically palpable disease, and 25 for microscopic disease. Number and percentage of positive nodes were similar between groups. Median follow-up was 39 months, and 2 patients had primary recurrence in the groin (1 in each group). Two additional patients had concurrent groin and systemic recurrence. Ipsilateral groin recurrence rate prior to systemic disease was similar at 4% and 3.7% for microscopic and palpable disease, respectively. Similarly, survival was comparable between groups (82% and 73%). Toxicities were comparable to previously published data.
conclusionSGD provides regional control rates similar to DGD and IOD, for lymph node metastases clinically limited to the groin, whether occult or clinically evident.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.