Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21136101›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2011

Evaluation of factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: "narrow pelvis" is not a contraindication.

Satoshi Ogiso, Takashi Yamaguchi, Hiroaki Hata, Meiki Fukuda, Iwao Ikai, Toshio Yamato, Yoshiharu Sakai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Satoshi OgisoDepartment of Surgery, Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, 1-1, Mukaihata-cho, Fukakusa, Fushimi-ku, Kyoto, 612-8555, Japan. oggy_so@ybb.ne.jp
Takashi Yamaguchi
Hiroaki Hata
Meiki Fukuda
Iwao Ikai
Toshio Yamato
Yoshiharu Sakai

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aims to evaluate the clinical and anatomical factors, particularly pelvic dimensions that influence the difficulty of performing laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer.

methodsWe studied 50 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic anterior resection with double-stapling technique (DST) anastomosis for rectal cancer between January 2006 and February 2010. Staging was performed by computed tomography. Five pelvic dimensions (anteroposterior and transverse diameters of pelvic inlet and outlet, and pelvic depth) were measured using three-dimensional volume-rendering images. We also examined a number of other clinical characteristics, including gender, history of laparotomy, body mass index (BMI), operator, tumor location, tumor depth, nodal involvement, and tumor diameter. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the predictive significance of these variables on surgical difficulty based on operative time and intraoperative blood loss.

resultsMales had significantly shorter pelvic inlets and outlets and significantly greater pelvic depth than females. However, gender did not significantly affect surgical outcomes, although males did tend to experience greater blood loss. Maximum tumor diameter (p=0.014), BMI (p=0.001), operator (p<0.001), and tumor location (p=0.009) were independent predictors of operative time, which, in turn, was related to intraoperative blood loss (p<0.001).

conclusionsMaximum tumor diameter, BMI, operator experience, and tumor location can be used to predict the operative time required to complete laparoscopic anterior resection with DST anastomosis for rectal cancer, with no correlations between pelvic dimensions and operative time. The difficulty of the procedure was not related to patients' pelvic dimensions, which led us to conclude that "narrow pelvis" is not a contraindication for this surgery. Based on these results, we suggest that laparoscopic anterior resection should be performed by experienced surgeons in patients with large tumors, high BMI, and/or extraperitoneal rectal cancer.

Indexed as

Digestive System Surgical ProceduresLaparoscopyAdenocarcinomaAgedBlood Loss, SurgicalBody Mass IndexContraindicationsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPelvimetryPelvisRectal NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesSex Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.