ReviewNature reviews. Urology2011
Urinary and sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer treatment.
Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 74 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Non-randomised Controlled Trial of Early Intervention to Preserve Erectile Function After Laparoscopic Resection for Rectal Cancer
Pilot Study of Physical Activity Intervention to Manage Bowel Dysfunction in Rectal Cancer Survivors
Who cites it
74 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Functional outcomes and quality of life following open versus laparoscopic versus robot-assisted versus transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Pooled it
- Towards personalized treatment of T2N0 rectal cancer: A systematic review of long-term oncological outcomes of neoadjuvant therapy followed by local excision.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2022Pooled it
- Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.World journal of surgical oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Quality of life in patients treated for anal carcinoma-a systematic literature review.International journal of colorectal disease · 2019Pooled it
- Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer in male urogenital function preservation, a meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2018Pooled it
- Effect of kegel pelvic floor muscle exercise on improving urinary disorder in rectum cancer patients after rectal surgery: a randomized clinical trial.International journal of colorectal disease · 2024Trial
- Quality of life and symptom burden after rectal cancer surgery: a randomised controlled trial comparing patient-led versus standard follow-up.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2024Trial
- Preservation versus resection of Denonvilliers' fascia in total mesorectal excision for male rectal cancer: follow-up analysis of the randomized PUF-01 trial.Nature communications · 2023Trial
- Organ preservation for clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer using neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and local excision (ACOSOG Z6041): results of an open-label, single-arm, multi-institutional, phase 2 trial.The Lancet. Oncology · 2015Trial
- A comparison of the technical and oncologic validity between robot-assisted and conventional open abdominoperineal resection.International journal of colorectal disease · 2014Trial
- Does the level of inferior mesenteric artery ligation affect outcomes in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- "Nobody Told Me": A Qualitative Study of Sexual and Reproductive Concerns After Treatment for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.Diseases of the colon and rectum · 2026Article
- The Role of MRI in Non-Operative Management of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Review
- Total Lesion Glycolysis (TLG) on 18F-FDG PET/CT as a Potential Predictor of Pathological Complete Response in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer After Total Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Retrospective Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Colorectal Cancer: Therapeutic Approaches and Their Complications.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Utilizing Patient Input in Rectal Cancer Trial Design.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025Article
- Early urinary catheter removal in patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial on silodosin versus no pharmacological treatment on urinary function in the early postoperative period.Annals of coloproctology · 2025Article
- Article
- Robotic vs. 3D laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: a single-center retrospective study of short-term outcomes and functional recovery.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in colorectal cancer management: a narrative review of clinical efficacy and multidisciplinary integration.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In light of the improving prognosis for patients with rectal cancer, the quality of functional outcome has become increasingly important. Despite the good functional results achieved by expert surgeons, large multicenter studies show that urogenital dysfunction remains a common problem after rectal cancer treatment. More than half of patients experience a deterioration in sexual function, consisting of ejaculatory problems and impotence in men and vaginal dryness and dyspareunia in women. Urinary dysfunction occurs in one-third of patients treated for rectal cancer. Surgical nerve damage is the main cause of urinary dysfunction. Radiotherapy seems to have a role in the development of sexual dysfunction, without affecting urinary function. Pelvic autonomic nerves are especially at risk in cases of low rectal cancer and during abdominoperineal resection. Data concerning nerve damage during laparoscopic surgery for resection of rectal cancer are awaited. Structured education of surgeons with regard to pelvic neuroanatomy, and systematic registration of identified nerves, could well be the key to improving functional outcome for these patients. Meanwhile, patients should be informed of all associated risks before their operation, and their functional status should be evaluated before and after surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21135876What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.